No AI Generated Content
Urban Renewal Planning and Water-Sensitive Principles Assignments
Struggling with your assignments? then this Free Sample written by PH.D certified subject expert academic writers can help you to improve your grades. For more detail information you can take free assignment related assistance from our assignment writing service providing team.
Research Proposal
This research work of the Docklands urban renewal planning project is one of the most successful projects in history with around 1500 apartments. In addition, several techniques are applied in order to implement this renewal project in the Fisherman’s Bend urban renewal project that will be introduced in this research paper.
Impact of problem and need of the research
There are different problems or issues that are faced by stakeholders and many more, on the other hand, this research is also essential. Through strong partnerships with the State Government developers, this renewal project will be accomplished. Melbourne city is frequently doing the work with the support of the Government’s Fisherman's Bend in order to carry forward the development work of this project.
Though there are multiple issues that the primary stakeholders are mainly facing. Based on the study of Mayne (2018), among all those, the main problem is communication between the stakeholders. Apart from this, there is a major risk in terms of political instability and poor planning. This further leads to catastrophic failure and failure in the entire project. Apparently, this is the biggest issue in terms of the completion of a successful overall project.
Another issue that can hamper the Fisherman’s Bend urban renewal project is the frequent storm lashes in Melbourne city. According to Mishra (2022), when there are excessive storms then the builders and developers of the project have to deal with this sort of natural challenges while construction. The Government of the state has negotiated dozens of high-rising buildings or towers. This results in investing millions of dollars and that is causing legal issues and bureaucratic problems.
In addition, there is a deficiency in motivation, acceptance, and clarity among the previous stakeholders and community as well. As per Newton (2021), the key or vital stakeholders of this project are the public, local community, future residence, existing residence, future business, the government of the state, government city council, and amongst all. These stakeholders' engagement further develops some sorts of issues while developing this Fisherman’s Bend urban renewal project. According to Tara (2018), problems or issues such as there is a difference in opinion and therefore issues arise while making a decision. Engineers, residents, and others can have different viewpoints regarding the completion of the project. Another issue that takes place is the competition between priorities. Everyone who is generally involved in this project comes up with new sets of expectations, objectives, and processes that are required in order to finish the project. Moreover, the most important thing is that one group does not have the same idea as compared to the other group. This can create a huge issue while doing such a big renewal project. Apart from this, there can be a conflict arising from resource constraints. Along with this, choosing resources for this Fisherman’s Bend urban renewal project can be a big deal. Public firms are generally under huge pressure in order to satisfy and meet the expectations of the stakeholders who are engaged in this urban renewal project. They mainly require people, equipment, and limited funds in order to finish the whole project victoriously. The disparate opinions and data can be another issue that can come from the side of stakeholders. The enabling of stakeholders in order to provide the input and data efficiently is the main challenge of this project. Here, public forums that are open can be confused or chaotic. The focus groups can not be represented at all. However, without any data standardization, a difficulty takes place or occurs in order to compare the capability of multiple ideas in an ideal way.
Along with these, there is the resistance to sharing data by the stakeholders that can ultimately impact the development of the project. Some stakeholders such as residents fear to share their personal information with the developing team. In addition, stakeholders usually tend to design the solution. According to Unkles (2018), sometimes, stakeholders are familiar with the process in that case they want to derive the conclusion which further puts an impact on the project. Another issue is that sometimes stakeholders define their requirements in the wrong way. This usually creates a problem for the team.
However, in order to resolve this kind of issue the organization or developing team heads of Fishermans Bend urban renewal project need to encourage the stakeholders in several ways. First, the developing head has to enhance the involvement or engagement of the stakeholders. After that, there has to be proper planning regarding decreasing the conflict among stakeholders and increasing the participation of the stakeholders in making strategic decisions for the project.
Significance of the research
The research will significantly conclude the importance of the dockland urban renewal project and its implementation on Fisherman bend urban renewal project. The renewal project of Docklands mandate has focused on providing quality public space along with integrated artwork. Contextual artwork themes have been created and that has led to the maintenance of high-quality space. These spaces are successful in creating enlightening experiences with interesting, comfortable and fusing each other easily. This project has also focused on the temperate climate of Melbourne and thereby indoor places are larger than outdoor spaces. Both indoor and outdoor places are easily accessible. Potential developers have been involved in the project with a conceptual plan that will be of competitive advantage (Ruming, 2018). The main criteria of the project are the agreement that has been made. These agreements form the basis of many aspects such as planning, design, public and environmental outcomes of the Docklands. Plans have been developed afterwards and are related to the original bid proposal.
The government has assessed all the bids for the redevelopment of the area such as Ambit and Design, Integration, Finance, risk and viability. The most important consideration about the project was a public benefit. All the spaces that have been created are connected and have proved to be a successful art journey. The lessons that have been learned from the Docklands project to further incorporate it as a strategy in developing Fisherman Bend urban project are efficient communication system, prioritsing consumers choice, innovative developemnt that customers can relate with and providing immense space of relaxation close to nature. The research will focus on every perspective of the Docklands project. Several plannings and aspects concepts have been implemented in the project such that it becomes more attractive and friendly to customers. Fishermans Bend project can have been influenced regarding the efficient planning that has been done and made it successful. Leading Melbourne architects in association with VicUrban formulated the design of the project. The art journey that has been created uses the city as a backdrop plan that demonstrates the urban and industrial interface along with indigenous history (Luxford, 2018). Statutory planning requirements have integrated designs that depict the public realm. Several signs of the Fisherman Bend Urban project has also been demonstrated. This project has been made taking into consideration several beneficial aspects that are being mentioned further.
Throughout this research paper, the researcher has illustrated that Fisherman’s Bend Melbourne has been built as per the sustainable vision. In order to obtain social responsibility, economic and world-leading environmental practices, there are around eight goals that are required to be accomplished. As per this paper, it is elaborated that in order to deliver all the employees and residents approach to open space. In order to link the community with the transport facilities, the project has been developed in this way. Based on the perspective of this paper, there are several facilities that will be provided to the residents in order to resist climatic calamities. There are different facilities in order to conserve water that will further help in times of necessity. Although, there are also some recycling facilities, that will be delivered to every employee and resident who is engaged in this project.
Apart from this, this research project can further help the team who are involved in development by suggesting to them several ways to improve this Fisherman’s Bend urban renewal project. Based on the study of Williams (2019), Fisherman’s Bend urban renewal project will be promoting a greener and cleaner community by recycling wastes of around 70 percent of households. Contractors and workforce management was not good in docklands,
Contractor was too old and not easily flexible according to the situation and projects with this paper, it is highlighted that in order to continue a biodiversity community they will be supporting the fauna and flora of Fisherman’s Bay. In order to give a brighter and good lifestyle to the residents and employees of the Fisherman’s Bend community, these goals or targets need to be kept in mind.
Key deliverables of the research
Docklands mandate has taken initiatives to reach out to people and provide them with an impactable experience. Thereby Fisherman's bend urban project has been launched in order to provide an industry-leading framework providing residence and employment to thousands of people. The place has been developed to be comfortable for all ages inspiring many people to choose residence closer to their job location. Availability of transport communication and public spaces will define more livability, sustainability and affordability of life. Extensive planning is needed to deliver executive planning of the framework of inner-city provisioning services and residence to thousands of people (Newton, 2020). The area has witnessed strategic framework planning working and communication with stakeholders, project control Group for the realisation of the ultimate vision. Communication issues have been identified for the Thai project previously. Getting inspired from Dockland's urban project, better communication is necessary to achieve goals. The strategic framework that has been determined the project strategically includes the development of housing diversity for different affordability levels and different life stages (Wong, 2018). Extensive planning exercise has been followed that includes new construction metals and methods for ensuring upgraded infrastructure and community services.
In the Docklands urban project customer's choices and thoughts have been given much priority such that it attracts them in visiting the places. Consequently, in the Fisherman project also people-centric design has been focused. It includes bike paths and walking ways. Moreover, the future livability credentials of Melbourne has also been improved through the provisioning of new public transport. The framework of the development of the Fishermen bend project has paved the way to create opportunities in the private sector. The overall vision of the government regarding the project can be mentioned as follows - a creation of a new vibrant community that will be a mixture of commercial, residential, entertainment, retail, transport, industry and other communication facilities (Newton, 2020). The redevelopment of the Fisherman's bend is to provide beautiful living spaces for all age groups and an alternative option for carrying out outward growth. People will choose this place as it will be providing facilities close to their working sector with better transportation and communication facilities.
This project had been divided into four parts to make it better for execution. This includes Montague Precinct, Sandridge Precinct and Wirraway Precinct. The majority of the land is being designed for the use of small to medium businesses and several small residential dwellings. The southern section of the area of projects has been designed to be the residential area. This project has been within four kilometres of the CBD and has provided several opportunities for delivering renewal outcomes. It has been noted that it will provide a strong economic advantage over several other cities and has maintained its enviable status for becoming a liveable city. Along with Dockland, Fisherman Bend urban project has been providing several renewal opportunities. A significant communication approach has been established in this. Project (Hepburn, 2020). It can be recommended that this communication system can be improved with a further strategy that will make the system more effective.
Community engagement and communication processes have provided related information to interested stakeholders and community members. Developmental scenarios and strategic direction for the progress of the project have been done through repeated prompt discussion with the Government for years. Several principles of engagement and communication have been observed for this project. While developing through the project plan it has been decided that individual stakeholders will have an individual responsibility to carry out and have to be actively involved in the decision-making scenario. A collaborative approach has been supported to ensure consistent, clear and coordinated distribution of necessary information (developmentready.com.au, 2020). Communication strategies are made such that every partner and stakeholders understand the opportunities. Media coverage is also encouraged for better publication. The Engagement objectives are set so that they may promote enthusiasm and awareness of any short term or long term visions.
References
Book
- Ruming, K. ed., 2018. Urban regeneration in Australia: policies, processes and projects of contemporary urban change. Routledge.
Journal
- Hepburn, E., Cendón, D.I., Bekele, D. and Currell, M., 2020. Environmental isotopes as indicators of groundwater recharge, residence times and salinity in a coastal urban redevelopment precinct in Australia. Hydrogeology Journal, 28(2), pp.503-520.
- Luxford, D. and Chandra, S., 2018. Harbour-side land parcel land-use changes: significance in re-development planning permit appraisal in Melbourne, Australia.
- Mayne, S., 2018. We hear you! Case studies in authentic civic engagement from the City of Melbourne. OPENING GOVERNMENT, p.115.
- Mishra, G., Acharya, G., Iyer, M. and Doshi, S., 2020, November. Deconstructing water sensitivity: experiences from global cities. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 592, No. 1, p. 012012). IOP Publishing.
- Newton, P. and Frantzeskaki, N., 2021. Creating a national urban research and development platform for advancing urban experimentation. Sustainability, 13(2), p.530.
- Newton, P.W. and Rogers, B.C., 2020. Transforming built environments: towards carbon neutral and blue-green cities. Sustainability, 12(11), p.4745.
- Tara, A., Ninsalam, Y. and Anderson, C., 2018. Interrogating Urban Renewal Scenarios Using Skyline Analysis in Fishermans Bend, Melbourne. Journal of Digital Landscape Architecture, 3, pp.2-11.
- Unkles, B., 2018. Transport Integration Act 2010: Good statute neutered. Planning News, 44(2), pp.26-27.
- Williams, G., Omanakuttan, U., Devika, J. and Jagajeevan, N., 2019. Planning a ‘slum free'Trivandrum: Housing upgrade and the rescaling of urban governance in India. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 37(2), pp.256-276.
- Wong, T.H., Rogers, B.C. and Brown, R.R., 2020. Transforming cities through water-sensitive principles and practices. One Earth, 3(4), pp.436-447.