Safecare A Comprehensive Infection Prevention And Control Initiative Assignment Sample

Introduction: Safecare A Comprehensive Infection Prevention And Control Initiative

Access Free Samples Prepared by our Subject Matter Experts, known for offering the Best Online Assignment Help Services in Australia

The "SafeCare" campaign expects to determine basic issues connected with disease counteraction and control inside the clinical setting of St. Peter's Hospital, an imaginary for a medical care facility situated in Australia. This campaign is expected to update patient and staff security and prosperity by carrying out evidence-based methodologies and interventions. In this study, the campaign's particular setting, interest group, justification, SMART goals, campaign structure, verification-based content, schedule, and evaluation measures are going to be approached.

The "SafeCare" campaign is a comprehensive disease counteraction and control drive custom-fitted for St. Peter's Hospital, an Australian medical service. With a different patient populace and variable keenness, the hospital faces the squeezing challenge of expanding emergency clinic-obtained diseases (HAIs). This mission is intended to relieve the effects of HAIs and improve patient and staff well-being.

Context and Target Audience

Clinical Context:

St. Peter's Hospital is a multi-disciplinary, 300-bed long-term office arranged in a metropolitan area of Australia. The facility gives a great many clinical advantages, including medical procedures, maternity care, and general clinical medications. It takes unique consideration of alternate patient people, from pediatric to geriatric, and oversees different clinical acuities.

Patient/Client Mix and Acuity:

The patient/client mix at St. Peter's Hospital incorporates clinical, surgical, obstetric, and pediatric patients. The facility encounters high occupancy rates and a broad range of acuity levels, from routine check-ups to complex medical procedures (Hegney et al. 2019). The medical clinic also serves as a trauma center, necessitating the management of various infections.

Staffing mix and Levels:

St. Peter's Medical Hospital employs roughly 500 clinical and non-clinical staff, including enrolled attendants, nurse practitioners, specialists, doctors, pharmacists, and support staff. The staffing levels fluctuate contingent upon the hour of the day, with extra staff present during night shifts and weekends to oblige higher patient burdens.

Characteristics of the Target Audience:

Understanding characteristics of the target audience is significant for fitting the "SafeCare" campaign effectively. For this situation, target audience incorporates both medical care staff and patients at St. Peter's Hospital in Australia. Here, the socio-economic situations and education levels of these two groups are going to be discussed.

Socio-Economic Situation:

Medical services staff at St. Peter's Hospital include a diverse range of socio-economic backgrounds. This diversity reflects the more extensive Australian medical services workforce, which incorporates experts from different pay levels. Medical caretakers, for instance, may have different financial conditions contrasted with doctors.

The financial circumstance of staff is affected by elements like experience, specialization, and employment contracts. Seasonal and part-time staff might have differed financial dependability contrasted with full-time, permanent employees (Ofori-Asenso et al. 2021).

Level of Education:

Medical services staff at St. Peter's Hospital exhibit many instructive foundations. This incorporates people with different instructive levels, from vocational qualifications to advanced degrees.

The hospital employs a blend of experts, like doctors, nurses, care staff and allied health care practitioners. Each category might have different instruction necessities, and their educational levels may vary accordingly

Patients

Socio-Economic Situation:

Patients at St. Peter's Hospital address a cross-section of the Australian populace. Their financial circumstances can vary significantly. The hospital serves both public and private patients, prompting socio-economic diversity.

Socio-economic factors impacting patients incorporate employment status, health care coverage and personal financial resources.

Level of Education:

Patient education levels can fluctuate widely. The hospital serves people with a range of spectrum of educational backgrounds .A few patients might have restricted formal education, while others might have higher levels of education. Instructive levels can affect patients' health literacy and their capacity to comprehend and adhere to disease anticipation and control conventions.

To successfully engage both medical services staff and patients in the "SafeCare" campaign, the content and delivery methods ought to be tailored to accommodate this diversity.

Justification

The "SafeCare" campaign is established on robust justification upheld by de-identified data and contemporary literature. The essential goal of this campaign is to resolve the major problem of hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) at St. Peter's Hospital in Australia. This section outlines the justification for the campaign with data and literature support.

Data-Driven Justification

De-identified data from St. Peter's Hospital reveals a critical need for the "SafeCare" campaign:

Hospital-Acquired Infections (HAIs)

An analysis of HAI rates throughout the last year shows a concerning upward trend. The information uncovers an expansion in the frequency of HAIs, including healthcare-associated pneumonia, surgical site infections, and urinary tract infections (Shaban et al. 2021). The latest information shows an outstanding spike in these diseases.

Patient Outcomes:

HAIs are related with adverse patient outcomes, including delayed clinic stays, expanded medical services costs, and, in extreme cases, patient morbidity and mortality (Corley et al. 2021). The information exhibits an immediate relationship between's HAI rates and these adverse results, putting a significant weight on the two patients and the medical services framework.

Economic Impact:

A financial examination demonstrates that the rising frequency of HAIs has prompted higher treatment costs, increased use of antibiotics, and subsequent surge in antibiotic resistance (Haghpanah, et al. 2023). The financial burden of overseeing HAIs is significant and impractical in the long haul.

Literature-Based Rationale

Contemporary literature further substantiates the need for the "SafeCare" campaign:

Infection Prevention Guidelines:

A survey of review of peer-reviewed literature underlines the significance of severe adherence to disease avoidance and control rules to mitigate the risk of HAIs. Publications from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the World Health Organization (WHO) underscore the need for evidence-based interventions to reduce HAIs.

Hand Hygiene Studies:

Extensive research upholds role of proper hand hygiene in reducing the transmission of infections ((Lotfinejad et al. 2021). Studies show that regular hand washing and sanitization significantly decrease the risk of HAIs.

Healthcare Workforce Training:

Literature highlights the positive effect of regular training and education on disease control practices among medical services laborers (Gezie et al. 2022). Training sessions and educational programs are distinguished as viable strategies for improving staff information and consistence with contamination control conventions.

Isolation Protocols:

Guidelines from health organizations and peer-reviewed studies support the utilization of isolation protocols for patients with irresistible infections. These conventions are perceived as basic for containing infectious illnesses, safeguarding different patients and medical care laborers, and minimizing the risk of outbreaks within the hospital.

Campaign SMART Goals

Goal 1: By the end of the first quarter of the campaign, reduce the overall HAI rate by 20% compared to the baseline.

Specific: The objective explicitly focuses on the decrease of hospital-acquired contaminations (HAIs), which is a basic issue recognized inside St. Peter's Hospital.

Measurable: The estimation of progress is characterized as a 20% decrease in the HAI rate compared to the baseline data, giving a quantitative indicator of accomplishment.

Attainable: This objective is feasible through the execution of proof-based infection prevention and control strategies, as upheld by literature and data.

Relevant: Given the rising rate of HAIs in the medical clinic, this objective is exceptionally applicable and straightforwardly resolves the clinical issue.

Time-Bound: The timeframe is specific - within the first quarter of the campaign - providing a clear deadline for achieving the 20% reduction.

Goal 2: Further develop staff and patient adherence to hand hygiene conventions by 25% within the initial half-year of the campaign.

Specific: This objective spotlights improving staff and patient adherence to hand hygiene practices, a key component of infection prevention and control.

Measurable: The estimation rule of 25% improvement in adherence is distinct, considering clear evaluation of progress.

Attainable: Improved hand hygiene practices are attainable through instructive projects, preparation, and continuous monitoring, making the objective practical.

Relevant: Considering that inadequate hand hygiene is a significant supporter of HAIs, this objective straightforwardly lines up with the clinical central concern.

Time-Bound: The objective makes some specific time frame inside the underlying half-year of the campaign, establishing a clear timeframe for achieving the 25% improvement.

Campaign Structure

The "SafeCare" campaign will be structured as follows:

Stage 1: Needs Evaluation (Month 1)

Objectives:

To assemble fundamental information on HAIs, survey staff and patient adherence to hand cleanliness, and review existing infection prevention and control protocols.

Activities:

• Conduct a baseline assessment of HAI rates and types.
• Overview staff to comprehend their insight and compliance with contamination control conventions.
• Oversee patient surveys to measure their comprehension and adherence to hand hygiene.
• Survey the current contamination avoidance and control strategies and methods.

Responsible Parties:

Infection Control Committee, Data Analysts, Survey Team, Infection Control Specialists.

Outcomes:

A comprehensive understanding of the ongoing contamination landscape, including areas that require prompt consideration has been found.

Stage 2: Instructive Mission (Months 2-3)

Objectives:

Create and convey proof-based instructive and preparing programs for both staff and patients to further develop disease avoidance and control practices.

Activities:

• Foster instructive materials, including pamphlets, banners, and online assets, on contamination anticipation and hand hygiene.
• Lead instructional courses for staff to update them on the latest infection control guidelines and practices.
• Plan patient instruction projects to bring issues to light about contamination avoidance.
• Make an available and easy-to-understand online stage for staff and patients to get to instructive materials.

Responsible Parties:

Education and Training Team, Infection Control Specialists, Patient Educators, IT Department.

Outcomes:

Upgraded information and consciousness of disease anticipation and control among staff and patients, prompting further improved practices have been obtained.

Stage 3: Execution (Months 4-6)

Objectives:

Present pragmatic contamination avoidance and control measures to upgrade security and lessen the gamble of HAIs.

Activities:

• Increment in the accessibility of hand sanitizer stations all through the clinic, particularly in high-traffic regions.
• Further, develop signage to remind staff and patients about legitimate hand cleanliness and contamination control.
• Start ordinary reviews to survey adherence to contamination control conventions.
• Execute disengagement conventions for patients with irresistible sicknesses.
• Upgrade cleaning and sanitization rehearses in high-risk regions.

Responsible Parties:

Infection Control Specialists, Facility Management, Audit Team, Nursing Staff, Environmental Services.

Outcomes:

Unmistakable upgrades in contamination avoidance and control practices, with expanded consistency to conventions.

Stage 4: Progressing Checking and Assessment (Months 7-12):

Objectives:

Regularly survey the impact of the campaign, make fundamental changes, and guarantee the supportability of upgrades.

Activities:

• Routinely evaluate HAI rates and contrast them with the pattern information.
• Lead reviews and direct perceptions to screen staff and patient adherence to contamination control practices.
• Keep an open input system for staff and patients to report concerns and ideas.
• Investigate review results and use them to direct further enhancements.

Responsible Parties:

Data Analysts, Infection Control Committee, Audit Team, Continuous Improvement Team.

Outcomes:

Ongoing improvement in infection prevention and control, with adjustments made as needed to sustain progress.

Evidence-Based Content of Campaign:

The "SafeCare" campaign by a proof-based approach, cautiously choosing and executing components that have a solid foundation in scientific research and best practices. The following components form the core of the campaign, each justified by contemporary peer-reviewed literature:

Research Materials on Infection Prevention and Control:

Evidence Base:

The instructive materials, including handouts, banners, and online assets, are created as per ebb and flow rules from regarded sources like the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). These materials incorporate the research findings on infection prevention and control.

Rationale:

Instructive materials act as available References, offering clear direction on prescribed procedures. Studies have shown that well-designed educational materials effectively raise awareness and improve adherence to infection control protocols (Lobdell, Stamou, & Sanchez, 2013).

Hand Hygiene Campaigns:

Evidence Base:

Broad examination upholds the significant job of appropriate hand cleanliness in decreasing the transmission of contaminations (Lotfinejad et al. 2021). Various examinations confirm that normal hand washing and disinfection essentially decline the gamble of clinic-procured contaminations (HAIs).

Rationale:

Hand hygiene campaigns are instrumental in building up the meaning of this training. Scientific research highlights that consistent schooling and updates concerning hand cleanliness are fundamental in lessening disease rates and improving patient well-being (Tan Jr, & Olivo, 2015).

Training Sessions for Staff

Evidence Base

Peer-reviewed literature and professional guidelines, such as those provided by the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC), substantiate the positive impact of regular training sessions. These sessions bolster staff knowledge and compliance with infection control guidelines.

Rationale

Training equips staff with the most recently accepted procedures, enabling them to forestall the transmission of diseases (Naik, 2022). Research features that thoroughly prepared medical services laborers assume a basic part in decreasing HAIs.

Regular Auditing and Feedback Mechanisms

Evidence Base

Research highlights the worth of routine reviews and criticism in checking and upgrading contamination control practices (Agreli et al. 2019). Reviews and criticism components are perceived as compelling apparatuses in recognizing regions for development.

Rationale

Consistent assessment through reviews and criticism is vital for surveying the viability of mediations, distinguishing areas of resistance, and working with continuous upgrades in disease control measures (Guest et al. 2019).

Enhanced Cleaning and Disinfection Practices

Evidence Base

Scientific literature and infection control guidelines underscore the basic job of thorough cleaning and sanitization practices in diminishing natural defilement and bringing down contamination rates (Otter et al. 2013).

Rationale

Enhanced cleaning and disinfection protocols in high-risk areas are essential to mitigate the presence of pathogens and reduce the risk of HAIs (Rutala, & Weber, 2019).

"SafeCare" Campaign Timeline

Phase	Month
Needs Assessment	1
Educational Campaign	2-3
Implementation	4-6
Ongoing Monitoring	7-12

Evaluation measures

To measure the viability of the "SafeCare" campaign and guarantee that it aligns with the SMART goals, a comprehensive set of evaluation strategies has been developed. These actions are intended to survey progress, give bits of knowledge, and work with changes depending on the situation:

Periodic HAI Rate Assessments

Objective:

The objective is to measure the effect of the mission on decreasing HAIs.

Strategy:

Lead ordinary evaluations of HAI rates and contrast them with pattern information (de Miranda Costa et al. 2020). These evaluations will be performed at set stretches to follow changes in contamination rates.

Surveys on Staff and Patient Knowledge and Adherence

Objective:

The objective is to assess the degree of mindfulness and adherence to disease counteraction conventions among staff and patients.

Strategy:

Oversee reviews of both staff and patients to measure their insight and adherence (Ilesanmi et al. 2021). The overviews will be led occasionally to quantify changes in mindfulness and consistency.

Direct Observations for Hand Hygiene Compliance

Objective:

The objective is to assess the effectiveness of hand hygiene campaigns.

Strategy:

Conduct direct observations to evaluate hand hygiene compliance among staff and patients. Observations will be performed regularly, allowing for real-time feedback and adjustments (Hoffmann et al. 2020).

Regular Audits for Tracking Implementation

Objective:

The objective is to guarantee the reliable execution of new contamination control practices.

Strategy:

Conduct regular audits to assess the implementation of enhanced practices, such as isolation protocols and cleaning procedures. Audits will provide a systematic evaluation of compliance and effectiveness.

Continuous Feedback and Communication Channels

Objective:

The objective is to keep up with open lines of correspondence with staff and patients, gather their ideas and concerns, and adjust the mission in like manner.

Strategy:

Lay out and keep up with correspondence channels for staff and patients to give criticism, report concerns, and make ideas. This input will be gathered constantly to empower ideal changes.

Reference

• Agreli, H., Barry, F., Burton, A., Creedon, S., Drennan, J., Gould, D., ... & Hegarty, J. (2019). Ethnographic study using Normalization Process Theory to understand the implementation process of infection prevention and control guidelines in Ireland. BMJ open, 9(8), e029514. Retrieved on 19^th October, 2023 from https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/bmjopen/9/8/e029514.full.pdf
• Corley, A., Lavana, J., Ahuja, A., Anstey, C., Haisz, E., Parke, R., ... & Fraser, J. (2021). Hospital-acquired infection rates in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation across Australia and New Zealand. Infection, Disease & Health, 26, S8. . Retrieved on 19^th October, 2023 from https://idhjournal.com/article/S2468-0451(21)00071-7/pdf
• de Miranda Costa, M. M., Santana, H. T., Hernandez, P. S., Carvalho, A. A., & da Silva Gama, Z. A. (2020). Results of a national system-wide quality improvement initiative for the implementation of evidence-based infection prevention practices in Brazilian hospitals. Journal of Hospital Infection, 105(1), 24-34. Retrieved on 19^th October, 2023 from https://siid.insp.mx/documents/curriculum/articles/indicators/1587666506_results_of_a_national_system-wide_quality_improvement_initiative_for_the_implementation_of_evidence-based_infection_prevention_practices_in_brazilian_hospital_compressed.pdf
• Gezie, H., Leta, E., Admasu, F., Gedamu, S., Dires, A., & Goshiye, D. (2019). Health care workers knowledge, attitude and practice towards hospital acquired infection prevention at Dessie referral hospital, Northeast Ethiopia. Clin J Nurs Care Pract, 3, 059-063. Retrieved on 19^th October, 2023 from https://www.nursingpracticejournal.com/articles/cjncp-aid1019.pdf
• Guest, J. F., Keating, T., Gould, D., & Wigglesworth, N. (2019). Modelling the costs and consequences of reducing healthcare-associated infections by improving hand hygiene in an average hospital in England. BMJ open, 9(10), e029971. Retrieved on 19^th October, 2023 from https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/bmjopen/9/10/e029971.full.pdf
• Haghpanah, F., Lin, G., Klein, E., & CDC MInD-Healthcare Program. (2023). Deconstructing the effects of stochasticity on transmission of hospital-acquired infections in ICUs. Royal Society Open Science, 10(9), 230277. Retrieved on 19^th October, 2023 from https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.230277
• Haque, M., Sartelli, M., McKimm, J., & Bakar, M. A. (2018). Health care-associated infections–an overview. Infection and drug resistance, 2321-2333. Retrieved on 19^th October, 2023 from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.2147/IDR.S177247
• Hegney, D. G., Rees, C. S., Osseiran?Moisson, R., Breen, L., Eley, R., Windsor, C., & Harvey, C. (2019). Perceptions of nursing workloads and contributing factors, and their impact on implicit care rationing: A Queensland, Australia study. Journal of Nursing Management, 27(2), 371-380. Retrieved on 19^th October, 2023 from https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:f0c5d12/UQf0c5d12_OA.pdf
• Hoffmann, M., Sendlhofer, G., Gombotz, V., Pregartner, G., Zierler, R., Schwarz, C., ... & Brunner, G. (2020). Hand hygiene compliance in intensive care units: An observational study. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 26(2), e12789. Retrieved on 19^th October, 2023 from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/ijn.12789
• Ilesanmi, O. S., Afolabi, A. A., Akande, A., Raji, T., & Mohammed, A. (2021). Infection prevention and control during COVID-19 pandemic: realities from health care workers in a north central state in Nigeria. Epidemiology & Infection, 149, e15.Retrieved on 19^th October, 2023 from https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/5E07D0F86779C31D73C97FCD85BAFFB6/S0950268821000017a.pdf/div-class-title-infection-prevention-and-control-during-covid-19-pandemic-realities-from-health-care-workers-in-a-north-central-state-in-nigeria-div.pdf
• Lobdell, K. W., Stamou, S., & Sanchez, J. A. (2013). Hospital-acquired infections. Surgical Clinics, 92(1), 65-77. Retrieved on 19^th October, 2023 from https://www.academia.edu/download/44790343/Hospital-Acquired_Infections20160416-15171-ra8lnw.pdf
• Lotfinejad, N., Peters, A., Tartari, E., Fankhauser-Rodriguez, C., Pires, D., & Pittet, D. (2021). Hand hygiene in health care: 20 years of ongoing advances and perspectives. The Lancet infectious diseases, 21(8), e209-e221. Retrieved on 19^th October, 2023 from https://pdi-intl.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Hand-hygiene-in-health-care-20-years-of-ongoing-advances-and-perspectives.pdf
• Naik, S. (2022). Mentoring Infection Preventionists: An Infection Prevention Practice Fellowship Program. Retrieved on 19^th October, 2023 from https://repository.usfca.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1104&context=dnp_qualifying
• Ofori-Asenso, R., Liew, D., Mårtensson, J., & Jones, D. (2020). The frequency of, and factors associated with prolonged hospitalization: a multicentre study in Victoria, Australia. Journal of clinical medicine, 9(9), 3055. Retrieved on 19^th October, 2023 from https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/CA8860676A29559E17202FE2B8FCB5EE/S2045796021000652a.pdf/sociodemographic-and-clinical-characteristics-in-child-and-youth-mental-health-comparison-of-routine-outcome-measurements-of-an-australian-and-dutch-outpatient-cohort.pdf
• Otter, J. A., Yezli, S., Perl, T. M., Barbut, F., & French, G. L. (2013). The role of ‘no-touch’automated room disinfection systems in infection prevention and control. Journal of Hospital Infection, 83(1), 1-13. Retrieved on 19^th October, 2023 from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Saber-Yezli/publication/233804492_The_role_of_%27no-touch%27_automated_room_disinfection_systems_in_infection_prevention_and_control/links/612c967ac69a4e487967d6a7/The-role-of-no-touch-automated-room-disinfection-systems-in-infection-prevention-and-control.pdf
• Rutala, W. A., & Weber, D. J. (2019). Best practices for disinfection of noncritical environmental surfaces and equipment in health care facilities: A bundle approach. American journal of infection control, 47, A96-A105. Retrieved on 19^th October, 2023 from https://cdr.lib.unc.edu/downloads/qf85nh617
• Shaban, R. Z., Mitchell, B. G., Russo, P. L., & Macbeth, D. (2021). Epidemiology of healthcare-associated infections in Australia: New data and challenges. Infection, Disease & Health, 26, S1-S2. Retrieved on 19^th October, 2023 from https://idhjournal.com/article/S2468-0451(21)00049-3/pdf
• Tan Jr, A. K., & Olivo, J. (2015). Assessing Healthcare Associated Infections and Hand Hygiene Perceptions amongst Healthcare Professionals. International Journal of Caring Sciences, 8(1). Retrieved on 19^th October, 2023 from https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=0749d03d5d7f390e05fa00643e18ab13a572d6e7
• Zingg, W., Holmes, A., Dettenkofer, M., Goetting, T., Secci, F., Clack, L., & Pittet, D. (2015). systematic review and evidence-based guidance on organization of hospital infection control programmes (SIGHT) study group. Hospital organisation, management, and structure for prevention of health-care-associated infection: a systematic review and expert consensus. Lancet Infect Dis, 15(2), 212-24. Retrieved on 19^th October, 2023 from https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/media/en/healthtopics/Healthcare-associated_infections/guidance-infection-prevention-control/Documents/hospital-organisation-management-structure-for-prevention-health-care-associated-infection-systematic-review.pdf