Research Paper For A Criminology Assignment Sample

Chapter 1: Introduction

Access Free Samples Prepared by our Subject Matter Experts, known for offering the Best Online Assignment Help Services in Australia.

1.1 Introduction

Crime fear is a pervasive problem within Australian society that influences individuals' health, well-being and safety around urban and suburban areas. This research focuses on understanding the complicated redeem ability perception of safety and Punitiveness interplay in the aspect of crime-relevant fear addressing to gain knowledge on their impact and significance. In this aspect, a critical analysis of the literature view, methodology, and finding discussion has been considered. After that, a discussion on the conclusion has been outlined here. In order to understand the influence and significance of the complex interactions between the impressions of safety, the potential to redeem, and punishment in the context of dread related to crime. this research focuses on these interactions where research problem will be discussed.

1.2 Research Problem

De Soto et al., (2021) stated that Crime fear remains a crucial challenge within Australia impacting community dynamics, public policy and individual behaviour.

The report reflects on crime experienced by people as of 2019 in Australia. It also represents those more than 22000 women in Australia face sexual assault that is the highest crime in comparison to other crimes (Statista, 2023). This research underscores the issue of punitive redeemability and how the safety of criminals is situated within the aspect of crime fear in both urban and urban settings. Gaining knowledge of this problem's nature is crucial to establishing an effective policy and intervention that increases community well-being and safety.

1.3 Rationale of the research

This study rationally lies in the requirement to thoroughly examine the complex relationship between punitive measures, perception of safety, redeemability and fear of crime within Australia. Burton et al. (2020) stated that gaining its significance within economic and social implications and in-depth understanding is crucial for developing community well-being and informed policy making helping to soothe the crime fear while enhancing overall colony safety.

1.4 Research Aim and Objectives

This research aims to investigate “how redeemability, punitiveness and perception of safety are situated with the fear of crime viewed”.

In order to meet this aim some research objectives have been developed which is to investigate the importance and influence of safety on fear of crime for pedants in suburban and urban areas of Australia. Further, to evaluate the relationship between fear of crime punitive measures and the perceived redeemability of offenders in the societal context of Australia. To analyze the importance of demographic factors such as gender age and socioeconomic status for understanding the perception of fear of crime and safety in Australia. To identify several potential interventions and strategies for mitigating the risk of fear of crime and enhanced perception of safety among the communities and interconnected factors in Australia for maintaining punitiveness and redeemability

1.5 Research questions

Through considering the research objective the research questions includes How do safety concerns impact the fear of crime in urban and suburban Australian communities?. What is the relationship between punitive measurement, fear of crime and redeemability of criminals in the Australian community aspect?. How do demographic factors such as socioeconomic status, age and gender influence the point of view of fear of crime and safety within Australia?. What possible strategies and interventions can be addressed to mitigate the fear of crime and increase safety within Australian society?

1.6 Research Scope

This research concentrated on fear of crime and its correlation in Australian urban and suburban areas. Dodd (née Buglar & Lla, 2021) stated that It contains several dimensions including Punitive measures, demographic impact, safety perception and redeemability. This research has national importance and does not focus on Australian crime fear comparison with those in other Nations.

1.7 Summary

In summary, it can be stated that the study identifies fear of crimes as a pressing challenge within Australia, especially in urban and some urban settings. The research focuses on examining unity business redeemability and safety impact in framing these fears while considering democratic factors influences. The finding has a high contribution to policies and informed strategies for increasing community well-being and safety.

Chapter 2: Literature review

2.1. Introduction

Fear of crime is one of the most impeccable issues that is affecting the safety and well-being of communities and individuals in Australia. In the context of this country, it is necessary to understand that the dimensions of redeemability perception and punitiveness in safety are crucial for maintaining the intricacies and comprehending the method of fear of crime. This literature review aims to develop a discussion based on several review journal articles that can elucidate and analyze the multifaceted impact of fear of crime in the societal context of Australia. This critical analysis reviews proper identity gaps and the importance of current research for the significant purpose of the study.

2.2. Search strategy

The inclusion of a search strategy will be able to define the elements and methods utilized to encourage the methodical examination of works of literature with regard to the topics of redemptiveness, racism as well as punitiveness as we continue forward with this study.The context of this study looks at how society perceives these topics, their uses, and what the general public thinks about them. The databases' sources included Google Scholar, the RMIT Library, SpringerLink, TandFonline, ScienceDirect, WileyOnlineLibrary, and SageJournals. The terms that were used in the searches, such as rehabilitation, public perception, redeemability, and harsher penalties, were relevant and germane to the questions. We obtained English-language papers on racial issues, punishment, and redeemability.

2.3. Dimension of fear and crime in Australia

According to several studies, the crucial impact of perceived safety on fear of crime has been shown among residents in both suburban and urban areas of Australia. According to different resources, it can be said that the correlation between the perceived safety and the level of fear experienced by communities and individuals is the highlighting process for understanding environmental factors and safety perception. Other than that according to Chataway & Hart, (2019), the work of different researchers it can be said that the psychological implication of fear and crime can be harmful to the well-being of the community. It is also an emphasizing process for targeting the interventions for enhancing the perceived safety of vulnerable groups.

2.4. Understanding punitiveness and redeemability

According to the Australian context, it is necessary to understand that the exploration of the relationship between redeemability and punitive measures is related to perceived processes of fear of crime and the well-being of the community. According to De Silva et al. (2022), it can be said that public attitudes can be maintained toward punitive measures for understanding the impact of collective fear of crime. It is an empathizing process for creating a balanced approach in maintaining the consideration process of rehabilitation. Moreover, there are several resources that the proof for understanding the providing insights for maintaining the nuances in the Australian justice system and the implication of perceived redeemability for understanding the offending processes for highlighting the importance and promoting retrospective justice to elevate fear of crime within all the communities.

Impact of demographic factors

Understanding and examining the impact of geographic and demographic factors is necessary for understanding the safety and fear of crime process for understanding the dynamics within the Australian community. According to Hart et al. (2022), it can be said that differential experiences can provoke fear of crime among various communities and age groups. It also plays an important role in the generation and the development of individual perceptions of safety and measurement. There are several additional forces for focusing intersectional perspectives on gender and socioeconomic status. There are several spotlights on maintaining the factors for vulnerability and influences that can specify the groups and communal perspective of fear of crime. These are the underscoring needs and tailored processes for community-based initiatives.

2.5. Influence of perceived safety on fear of crime

According to Chataway et al. (2019), the influence of perceived safety on several perspectives of fear of crime among the people living in urban and suburban areas in Australia is a challenging factor for understanding the warrants and its careful examination for several studies that can highlight the impact on safety and the level of PR for individual living within communities. Other than that it can be demonstrated that the heightened perception of perceived sins and safety can be correlated with lower levels of residential fear with pivotal management that can indicate the environmental factor for shaping safety and well-being. Additionally, several findings can emphasize typological implications and highlight Detrimental factors for understanding the overall effect of the communal factors.

On the other hand in particularly Australian context it can be said that the intensity between environmental design and communal policies can be created by focusing on several strategies and social cohesion for shaping residential safety. Several factors such as active community engagement, efficient law enforcement and public areas can contribute to fostering a sense of security and safety. Therefore it is necessary to understand that the elevation of individuals can maintain the dynamics for formulating target interventions for enhancing the promotion of resilient communities.

Relationship between punitive measures' perceived redeemability and fear of crime

Based on several resources it is understandable that the relationship between fear of crime punitive measures and perceived redeemability can be criticized based on several contextual properties in Australian communities for a multifaceted and complex challenge that necessitates comprehensive perspectives. Several studies by Burton et al. (2020), have been highlighting the implication of these punitive measures for the collective process and emphasizing its balanced approach for several prospects of offending rehabilitation. Resource indication and an excessive punitive approach to a crime can contribute to maintaining communal fear and crime. It is also necessary to suggest that the over-punitive stance can be effective in addressing criminal behavior and the root cause of criminal activities.

Furthermore, it is also important to understand the crucial processes of the underlying meaning of maintaining the redeemability that can maintain the dynamics in promoting a retrospective perspective for prioritizing rehabilitation and reintegration of people from the sense of positive transformation. According to Lim (2019), and the Australian context, it is necessary to find out the process of imperative striking that can create a balance between measures and punitive rehabilitation efforts. Other than that, acknowledging the significance process is necessary for creating opportunities for redemption and the well-being of the broader community (Stevens, 2023). This requires a comprehensive approach for integrating effective purposes for communal engagement and initiatives several perspectives are necessary for maintaining the cultivation of a compassionate security process within the societal environment. However, it is also important to understand that empirical research and initiatives are necessary for maintaining a crucial understanding of the intricate relationship between fear of crime punitive measures and the perceived redeemability for offenders within maintaining ultimate goals for fostering a healthier and safer society in the Australian community.

2.6. Demographic factors such as gender age and socioeconomic status in maintaining safety

Understanding and assessing the impact of several demographic factors is necessary to find out the perspective of fear of crime and safety in Australia. Several resources can reveal the nuance dynamic for understanding the contributing process and variables within different population segments. These studies also highlight differential experiences and fear of crime for several groups and societal perspectives that have the role of regeneration and shaping individual processes of safety (Wozniak et al. 2022). These resources are also conducted to indicate that the individual trained can exhibit higher levels of fear compared to different crime rates and older cohorts. These are the heightened sense of lack of experience and vulnerability in a societal context.

Moreover, there are several introspection processes of socioeconomic status and gender for influence vulnerability in specific groups. According to different resources, the emphasizing process can indicate that women and lower socioeconomic individuals are more susceptible 2 experience the fear of crime and it is a concerned process for personal security and safety. These processes also suggest socioeconomic disparities and gender probabilities for the contribution of significant processes in safety, crime and fear. Understanding these demographics are also crucial for developing target intervention that can help create policies for different segments of the population (Burton et al. 2021). However, it also creates a separate acknowledging purpose for understanding the socioeconomic perspective for maintaining the policy-making process in maintaining fear of crime. It is a process that includes communal stakeholders for implementing proactive measures and promoting inclusivity.

2.7. Literature gap

Despite all the context of several perspectives on fear of crime in the Australian context it is necessary to understand the remaining process of a significant gap for maintaining the interplay between communal cohesion, perception of safety, and social capital. The study by Cozens & Sun, (2019), has highlighted that the impact of environmental factors and demographic variables can influence fear of crime and it is a comprehensive process for maintaining communal dynamics maintaining a deeper investigation with community engagement initiatives, and building measures for the holistic intervention of people (Lee et al. 2020). On the other hand, it is also important to understand that the vulnerable insights also have a proper mechanism for contributing to neighborhood processes that can create a deeper investigative purpose for influencing community engagement initiatives social networks, and maintaining the processes for communal implication for safety and crime management.

2.8. Summary

In conclusion, it can be said that the dynamics that are important for maintaining the fear of crime in the local and societal perspective are necessary for the Australian government to create several policies and legislation for maintaining these issues. On the other hand, it is also necessary to create an active purpose and develop several rules for maintaining proper societal and communal development and understanding the background issues from individual and communal perspectives. However, it is also important to understand that these issues can be maintained by understanding and analyzing their proper findings of their impact on social and communal range.

Chapter 3: Methodology

3.1 Introduction

In this section of the research, they are mainly incorporated to evaluate the interplay of Punitiveness, redeemability and safety point of view concerning fear of crime. In this section, the discussion is based on research philosophy, approach and design. The data-gathering process is also explained, highlighting ethical considerations throughout. Secondary qualitative method has been used to conduct the research, which is essential to identify the opinion and observation of various authors in order to improve data utility and generate in-depth data. In-depth insights is the main outcome that needs to be gained from this research.

3.2 Research onion

Figure 3.1: Research onion

(Source: Saunders et al. 2007)

Belov & Novikov, (2020) stated that the selection of research philosophy has an essential role in developing research direction. In this aspect, interpretivism has been adopted as a research philosophy due to its distinguishing attributes. It also highlights subjective knowledge's significance in acquiring through observation and experiences including morality and personal values from the process. This philosophy is valuable for suitable Idea application and comparative analysis drawn from previous literature. It is well suited for quantitative research facilities that allow interpretation and in-depth exploration of the gathered data.

3.3 Research design

Kothari, (2023/2021) stated that the Research design helps to supply a proper structure of the research so that the research can be conducted smoothly. In this aspect tax descriptive size design has been employed for qualitative research with a particular concentration on semi-structured interviews. This approach allows an open-ended and flexible exploration of participants' experience and view permitting high data collection for meeting the research objective.

3.4 Research approach

In this aspect the research approach is phenomenological. Abu-Taieh et al., (2023/2020) stated that it helps to address the understanding and discover the live perception and experience of participants in the aspect of subject matter. This is the well-suited approach for the qualitative nature of the research and supports its in-depth exploration.

3.5 Data collection

Devezer et al.,(2021) stated that Research gathered data is required to establish a particular style of research that can help in interpreting all possible future outcomes through evaluating additional data collection methods. In this aspect, primary qualitative data has been selected due to deep understanding and contextually reaching inside in a direct manner from the resource facilitating and in-depth knowledge of research phenomena. In this context, 25 participants' interviews have been conducted. In this aspect, the selected interview is a semi-structure for the facility depth conversation permitting participants to share their inside perceptions and experiences relevant to the study topic. In order to collect data, 10 open-ended questions have been developed to achieve study goals and to process the interview Likert scale method has been selected.

3.6 Data analysis

Lury, (2023/2021) stated that to evaluate the interview data thematic analysis has been employed. This method includes coding, organizing and addressing key patterns and themes that emerge from the interview procedure supplying a comprehensive and structured qualitative data understanding.

3.7 Validity and Reliability

Lury, (2023/2021) stated that reliability and validity are the key concepts of methodology. In that relativity represents research outcomes consistency while the same result can be found during exact approaches that are applied repeatedly. It is essential for developing trust in data effectiveness and authenticity for future research. In qualitative analysis, the data grade value measures the procedure's accuracy and relativity for maintaining dependable outcomes. On the other hand, validity returns to research finding accuracy. On the contrary Sim & Waterfield, (2019) stated that It helps in accessing the extent to which observation can precisely so cases measure phenomena within qualitative research. Both reliability and validity have the primary aim of supplying valuable and replicable data.

According to Devezer et al. (2021) the conduct of the research was done by focusing on research rules and ethics to eliminate any potential implications that could be relevant to the authenticity or legality of the research. However, Belov & Novikov (2020) claimed that the chosen information was preserved through previous consent, which also aids in preserving anonymity. Data breaches and data manipulation activities have not occurred during the data collection process. By protecting the rights, dignity, and wellbeing of research participants, research quality is maintained.

Together those approaches help to supply a broad understanding for maintaining research credibility and quality that has a high contribution to trustworthy and robust scientific knowledge development. It includes several steps such as member checking, reflexive journal maintenance and peer debriefing.

3.9 Research gap

The interview process helps in indepth exploration of participants perspectives and experiences with fostering rapport and nuanced data. However it possesses some limitations as it encompasses possible interviewer bias with socially desirable responses and lack in generazablity from participants.

3.10 Summary

In the summer it can be stated that in order to contact the research here primary qualitative research method has been taken that utilizes all interpretivist philosophy, thematic analysis strategy and phenomenological design. Ethical practices and consideration are followed to increase the reliability and validity of the study while maintaining robust and effective quality findings from 25 participants interviewed.

Chapter 4: Findings and Discussion

4.1 Findings of Primary Qualitative Data

Questionnaires for Interview

1. What is your age?

Under 20	20-30 years	31-40 years	41-50 years	51-60 years	Above 60 years
2	10	8	4	1	0

Table 1: Responses on the age group of the participants

Most of the participants are between the ages of 22 and 30 years

2. What is your gender?

Male	Female	Others
8	15	2

Table 2: Responses on gender of the participants

Most of the participants are female.

3. What is occupation?

After asking this question most of the people selected their occupation option as a worker in a company.

4. Can you share your observations or experiences that underscore your engagement with the criminal justice system whether an offender, community member and victim?

Most of the participants' observations and experiences underscore different engagement with the criminal justice system; some participants share their experience as crime victims while others discuss their environment as community members and offenders that represent interactions multiplied with the system in the aspect of their community and lives.

5. Concerning the redeemability aspect, can you show your point of view on whether people involved in the criminal justice system can rehabilitate or transform themselves and what factors contribute to your belief?

In this question, 14 out of 25 participants expressed their opinion of the rehabilitated possibility of people concerned within the criminal justice system. The perceived personal transformation and growth are possible with factors including support network, reform opportunities and education assessment which have high contributions in developing their optimistic point of view.

6. Can you remember any unanticipated experience or insight you faced relevant to a criminal justice system that challenged your initial assumption and belief?

17 out of 25 participants responded that they noticed and experienced sexual assault within the community which underscores the uncomfortable prevalence of this challenge. Their willingness to transfer this meeting highlights the compulsory requirement for identifying and reforming the criminal justice system to adequately support victims and prevent such types of incidents.

7. In your opinion how does socioeconomic position influence individuals' criminal justice system introduction and what disparities have you noticed in this context?

According to most of the participants, socioeconomic position efficiently influences visual opinion and experience within the criminal justice system. The desperation occurs in legal representation, sentencing severity and resource access. Participants have learnt that those with minimum finances often face severe challenges and inequalities during system navigation.

8. How do you sense overall criminal justice system performances in the community and what particular aspects do you think require improvement?

Participants supplied different perspectives on the criminal justice system's overall performance within the community. They emphasize there is an improvement requirement within the areas such as legal council access rehabilitation events for offenders and fair sentencing. These large insights highlight recommendations and concern the multifaceted nature of reform.

9. Are there meaningful differences in your opinion of the criminal justice system considering your age and in case so, what might justify these differences?

Differences within participants' points of view of the criminal justice system were evident. Older people emphasize the additional punitive approach requirement on the other hand younger participants shift toward reform and rehabilitation. These differences may be attributed to general perspectives and different life experiences that framed their opinions.

10. What is your opinion on the gender role in the criminal justice system and how does it affect your justice and fairness perception?

Most of the participants believe that it is influential on fairness and justice perception and suggests that gender bias can guide toward disparity in treatment and sentences. This emphasizes the consent about equality of the system by addressing the necessity of the aspect of gender-relevant challenges.

4.2 Discussion of Findings

Theme 1: Rehabilitation and redeemability perception

Questions 4, 5 and 6 revolve around participants' redeemability points of view and any unexpected insight or experience relevant to the criminal justice system. This theme encompasses participants' opinions on the possibility of people rehabilitating and reforming the criminal justice system.

The perception of rehabilitation and redeemability in the aspect of the criminal justice system is a multifaceted and complicated issue. Rehabilitation is incorporated with the point of view that individuals who are relevant to crimes can undergo personal growth and change procedures that can help to reintegrate within the community as law-abiding persons (De Soto et al., 2021). The redeemability is the same as rehabilitation suggesting that those who committed a crime can save themselves and produce amendments for their effort. Both can differ among people and impact through several factors ranges including cultural norms, societal attitudes and personal beliefs toward punishment and crime (Burton et al., 2020). That is another opinion that emphasizes reform chances offering significance on their point of view that can affect to minimize precipizam with making a safer community.

Theme 2: criminal justice system and social inequality

Questions 7, 8,9 and 10 concentrated on the social economic situation, criminal justice system performance point of view and age-relevant possibilities within the opinion. This thing explores how an individual's engagement influences the socioeconomic status within the criminal justice system. It also examines the open areas of the lake areas that need to be improved. According to the participants, that is the interconnection between social inequality and the criminal justice system that disparity affects legal representation assessment. It also shows that the majority groups and socio-economic backgrounds face this professionality influence through social inequality. It also said the system of equality within justice administration food severely influences the criminal justice system's effectiveness and fairness (Dodd, 2020). In the inequalities within the colony, it is crucial to maintain equitable action and treatment while minimizing recidivism to develop loyalty between law enforcement and the community. Additionally, policymakers need to focus on reforming policies and practices to eliminate these disparities.

4.3 summary

Within the criminal justice system redeems ability and rehabilitative perception are multiplicated which offers personal transformation possibilities. On the other hand, redeemability supplies amendments to offenders. People's point of view on this aspect is shaped by cultural norms, societal attitudes and personal beliefs.

The introduction of the criminal justice system with social inequality is a growing challenge that generates desperation for lower socioeconomic status people (Brady & Graham, 2023) . Therefore policymakers and legal representatives need to concentrate on reforming their policies to rectify inequality while maintaining equity and fairness.

Chapter 5: Conclusion

In conclusion, it can be said that this research highlights redemption, safety point of view anditiveness interconnectedness complexity Within Australian urban and Suburban areas. Through this, it was found that rehabilitation and redeemability is a content controversy between individuals. From some individuals' point of view, there is a need for change in the reform or some other people's reviews that they need to provide more chances to change themselves. Understanding and examining the impact of geographic and demographic factors is necessary for comprehending the safety and fear of crime procedure for comprehending the dynamics within the Australian community.

Linking with objectives

Linking with objective 1:

This objective discusses safety, influence and importance of crime fear. In this aspect the thing one discussed all about this. According to the research and participants' data, it has been found that perceived safety has a crucial influence on the fear of crime that is noticed among residents in both suburban and urban areas of Australia.

Linking with objective 2:

This area discusses crime punitive measures and redeems ability relationships in the Australian context the literature review and theme one has discussed this area. Through this, it can be understood that public attitudes and social norms can be maintained toward punitive measures for gaining knowledge on collective fear of crime influences.

Linking with objective 3:

This objective emphasizes on demographic factors significance discussed in theme 2. After researching it was noticed that in the Australian aspect, the intensity between communal policies and environmental design can be generated by conc Edn training on several strategies such as policy reform and social collaboration for ensuring residential safety.

Linking with objective 4:

This objective is based on several possible strategies and interventions addressed to eliminate crime fear. This area is covered by theme 2 and literature review 4. From this, it was found that distinct experiences as well as fear of crime for societal and individual perspectives that possess regeneration role help in shaping individual safety.

Recommendation

Recommendation 1: The imperative to develop evidence-based practices and policies within the criminal justice system

This contains an incorporated sentencing, rehabilitation and intervention program to account for the offender's unique circumstances. Along with that enhancing legal representation and resource access for marginalized societies is essential for eliminating system inequalities. On the other hand, they can use public awareness campaigns that can challenge biases and stereotypes especially in the aspect of gender that helps in promoting equity and fairness within the society (Verona & Fox, 2023/2023). Overall it can be stated that a holistic strategy that combines resource access, public education and rehabilitation is essential for meeting an effective and adequate criminal justice system within Australian urban and suburban areas.

References

• Abu-Taieh, E., Hadid, I. H. A., & Mouatasim, A. E. (2020). Cyberspace. In Google Books. BoD – Books on Demand. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=eqf8DwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA27&dq=methodology&ots=cKV37Ri7Ma&sig=4ulaoa8Q-skYG5W425z2m6Lfkvk (Original work published 2023)
• Belov, M. V., & Novikov, D. A. (2020). Methodology of complex activity : foundations of understanding and modelling. Springer. (Original work published 2023)
• Brady, C. M., & Graham, A. (2023). Perceived Rehabilitation Across Types of Justice-Involved Individuals: An Experiment. American Journal of Criminal Justice. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-023-09738-4
• Burton, A. L., Cullen, F. T., Burton Jr, V. S., Graham, A., Butler, L. C., & Thielo, A. J. (2020). Belief in redeemability and punitive public opinion:“Once a criminal, always a criminal” revisited. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 47(6), 712-732. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854820913585
• Burton, A. L., Cullen, F. T., Burton, V. S., Graham, A., Butler, L. C., & Thielo, A. J. (2020). Belief in Redeemability and Punitive Public Opinion: “Once a Criminal, Always a Criminal” Revisited. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 47(6), 712–732. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854820913585
• Burton, A. L., Cullen, F. T., Pickett, J. T., Burton Jr, V. S., & Thielo, A. J. (2021). Beyond the eternal criminal record: Public support for expungement. Criminology & Public Policy, 20(1), 123-151. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12531
• Chataway, M. L., & Hart, T. C. (2019). A social-psychological process of “fear of crime” for men and women: Revisiting gender differences from a new perspective. Victims & Offenders, 14(2), 143-164. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2018.1552221
• Chataway, M. L., Hart, T. C., & Bond, C. (2019). The social-psychological process of fearing crime: Developing and testing a new momentary model of victimisation worry. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004865819836153
• Cozens, P. & Sun, M.Y. (2019), "Exploring crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED) and students’ fear of crime at an Australian university campus using prospect and refuge theory", Property Management, Vol. 37 No. 2, pp. 287-306. https://doi.org/10.1108/PM-04-2018-0023
• De Silva, B., Dharmasiri, K. S., MPAA, B., & KGNU, R. (2021). An Overview of Fear of Crime and Its Criminological Significance. De Silva, KBN, Dharmasiri, KS, Buddhadasa, MPAA, & Ranaweera, KGNU (2021). An Overview of Fear of Crime and Its Criminological Significance. GNOSI: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Human Theory and Praxis, 4(3), 101-125. https://gnosijournal.com/index.php/gnosi/ar
• De Soto, W., Wiener, K. K. K., Tajalli, H., & Brookman, R. (2021). A comparison between Australian and US populations on attitudes to criminal behaviours. Psychology, Crime & Law, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316x.2021.1880585
• Devezer, B., Navarro, D. J., Vandekerckhove, J., & Ozge Buzbas, E. (2021). The case for formal methodology in scientific reform. Royal Society Open Science, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.200805
• Dodd (née Buglar, S., & Lla. (2021). Gendered views on parole: Exploring how emotion and emotion management help to explain gender differences in the Australian public’s views on parole. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/227721801.pdf
• Dodd, S. (2020). Journal of Qualitative Criminal Justice & Criminology• 2020| Volume 8, Issue 4. Pubpub.org. https://assets.pubpub.org/3njc1o5s/9c2003b8-1796-45d8-915f-fb3173466d06.pdf
• Hart, T. C., Chataway, M., & Mellberg, J. (2022). Measuring fear of crime during the past 25 years: A systematic quantitative literature review. Journal of Criminal Justice, 82, 101988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2022.101988
• Kothari, B. L. (2021). Research methodology tools and techniques. Jaipur Abd Publ. (Original work published 2023)
• Lee, M., Jackson, J., & Ellis, J. R. (2020). Functional and dysfunctional fear of crime in inner Sydney: Findings from the quantitative component of a mixed-methods study. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004865820911994
• Lim, S. B., Yong, C. K., Malek, J. A., Jali, M. F., Awang, A. H., & Tahir, Z. (2019). Effectiveness of Fear and Crime Prevention Strategy for Sustainability of Safe City. Sustainability, 12(24), 10593. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410593
• Lury, C. (2021). Problem Spaces. John Wiley & Sons. (Original work published 2023)
• Sim, J., & Waterfield, J. (2019). Focus group methodology: Some ethical challenges. Quality & Quantity, 53(6), 3003–3022. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11135-019-00914-5
• Statista. (2020). Australia - recorded persons with crime experience by type of crime. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/647987/australia-recorded-persons-with-crime-experience-by-type-of-crime/
• Stevens, J. (2023). Desistance as a Signal of Rehabilitation: Understanding Public Perception and the Moderating Role of Redeemability. https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?file=0&article=3829&context=etd&type=additional
• Verona, E., & Fox, B. (2023). Routledge Handbook of Evidence-Based Criminal Justice Practices. In Google Books. Taylor & Francis. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=99nWEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=RA4-PT100&dq=The+imperative+to+develop+evidence-based+practices+and+policies+within+the+criminal+justice+system&ots=qlumI4f4DZ&sig=2FjIAzV-hF2A36IceDS-0WJ5anE (Original work published 2023)
• Wozniak, K. H., Pickett, J. T., & Brown, E. K. (2022). Judging hardworking robbers and lazy thieves: an experimental test of act-vs. person-centered punitiveness and perceived redeemability. Justice quarterly, 39(7), 1565-1591. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2022.2111326
• Zeng, E., Dong, Y., Yan, L., & Lin, A. (2022). Perceived Safety in the Neighborhood: Exploring the Role of Built Environment, Social Factors, Physical Activity and Multiple Pathways of Influence. Buildings, 13(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13010002