Report Outlining The Design And Construction Of A Suitable Basement Foundation For The Commercial Retail Development Assignment Sample

1. Introduction: Report Outlining The Design And Construction Of A Suitable Basement Foundation For The Commercial Retail Development

Access Free Samples Prepared by our Subject Matter Experts, known for offering the Best Online Assignment Help Services in Australia.

The report discusses the design and construction process of a suitable basement foundation for commercial retail development. The selection of a suitable basement foundation is central to the progress of any business retail improvement. A very much-planned establishment guarantees structural stability, load-bearing limit, and practical utility of the space. The establishment should oblige the requests of a clamoring retail climate, supporting the heaviness of products, gear, and people strolling through. Contemplations like site-explicit circumstances, soil creation, and water table levels impact the decision of establishment. Whether choosing a piece on-grade starting point for simple entry or a full cellar for added capacity or retail space, cautious preparation and designing mastery are fundamental to making a solid groundwork that endures over the extremely long haul.

Problems conceptualizations

Site Conditions and Soil Mechanics:

Problem: The kind of soil and its bearing limit can fundamentally influence the establishment plan. Unsatisfactory soil conditions could require extra adjustment measures, like profound establishments or ground improvement methods.

Water Table and Drainage:

Problem: In the event that the water table is high, there's a gamble of water penetration into the storm cellar (Rahman et al. 2020). Appropriate waterproofing and waste frameworks should be intended to forestall water harm and shape development.

Adjacent Structures and Utilities:

Problem: Existing close-by designs and utility lines can restrict the degree and profundity of removal for the storm cellar. Cautious arranging is expected to stay away from obstruction and guarantee security.

Building Development and Settlement:

Problem: Structures settle over the long run, particularly in regions with delicate soil. Differential settlement can prompt underlying Problems and harm to wrap up. Appropriate establishment plans and checking are expected to limit these impacts.

Fire and Life Security:

Problem: Storm cellars need satisfactory fire insurance measures because of restricted departure choices. Executing heat-proof materials, appropriate ventilation, and crisis exits are vital for tenant well-being.

Ventilation and Air Quality:

Problem: Cellars can have unfortunate air dissemination and air quality. Planning viable ventilation frameworks to keep an agreeable and solid climate is fundamental for the two customers and representatives.

Background

Site Appraisal and Soil Examination:

Before any plan work starts, an intensive site evaluation is led to comprehend the geographical and geotechnical states of the area. Soil examination is basic to decide the sort of soil, its heap-bearing limit, and potential for settlement. This data assists engineers with picking fitting establishment types and plan boundaries.

Establishment Type Determination:

• Pontoon or Mat Establishments: These enormous, thick pieces of built-up concrete convey the structure's heap equally over the whole storm cellar region.
• Heaped Establishments: When soil conditions are less positive, driven or exhausted heaps can be utilized to move the heap to more profound, more steady layers.
• Cellar Walls: At times, the cellar's edge walls themselves can go about as establishment walls, moving burdens to the dirt.

Underlying model:

When the establishment type is picked, underlying specialists foster itemized plan designs that incorporate aspects, support necessities, and burden-bearing limits. These plans are made utilizing specific programming to guarantee the establishment's solidness and well-being under various loads and conditions.

Waterproofing and Seepage:

Cellars are powerless to water interruption, so waterproofing is a significant thought. Contingent upon the neighborhood environment, water table level, and different elements, a blend of outside and inside waterproofing strategies may be utilized. Furthermore, a successful waste framework, including sump siphons and seepage pipes, is intended to forestall water development around the establishment.

Unearthing and Development:

The development cycle includes uncovering the cellar region and the execution of the picked establishment type (Choobbasti et al. 2021). This could incorporate pouring cement for pontoon establishments, driving heaps, or developing built-up cellar walls. Legitimate compaction of the dirt and cautious execution of development methods are essential to guarantee the establishment's uprightness.

Figure 1: Basement parking space

(Source: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/12/1/4)

Car park calculations

Car park calculation

Assuming the GFA is 80000 m²

Each floor area is 8000 m²

The number of car parks required = 80000/60 = 1333 approx [as 1 space per 60m² gfa]

Basement level calculation

Assuming the basement floor area is = 8000 m² [same as each floor area]

The number of car parks that can be provided in each basement = (8000*0.6)/13 [as per AS/NZS 2890.1:2004 each car space is approx 13m² ] = 369 approx

Assuming up to 60% of the Basement floor area can be used for car parks

Therefore, basement levels are required (369/13) = 28.38 approx

2: Site Analysis

Ground Conditions:

Newcastle is situated on the eastern shore of Australia, in the province of New South Ridges. The geography of the locale fundamentally comprises of sedimentary rocks, including sandstone and coal creases. The presence of coal has generally been a critical figure the improvement of Newcastle.

Given the coastal location, the ground conditions in Newcastle can incorporate a blend of soil types like sand, dirt, and rock. The particular geotechnical attributes of the area would rely upon the specific area inside the downtown area.

Surrounding Environment:

Newcastle is known for its pleasant coastline, with wonderful sea shores extending along the eastern edge of the downtown area. A portion of the outstanding sea shores incorporates Newcastle Ocean side, Nobbys Oceanside, and Merewether Oceanside. These sea shores give sporting open doors as well as add to the general stylish allure of the city.

The downtown area is arranged around the harbor, and the Newcastle Harbor plays had a critical impact on the city's set of experiences. It has filled in as a significant port for coal trade and different products (Rasoulian & Gibson, 2020). Throughout the long term, the harbor region has gone through redevelopment, changing a few modern spaces into lively waterfront areas with cafés, shops, and sporting spaces.

The city's engineering is a mix of memorable structures and current designs. The Newcastle CBD (Central Business District) includes a blend of business, retail, and private spaces. The horizon is described by a blend of low-ascent and mid-ascent structures, for certain taller designs in key regions. Newcastle is additionally known for its social and instructive organizations. The College of Newcastle is a critical presence in the city, adding to its scholar and exploration profile.

3. Suitability of the various basement construction methods in response to specific site conditions

Basement construction/excavation methods comparison

Open Cut Method:

Description:

The open-cut method, also known as the "bottom-up" method, is a traditional approach to basement construction/excavation. It involves digging a large hole directly into the ground, usually starting from the ground surface and digging downwards. This method is commonly used for constructing basements in areas where the soil conditions are relatively stable and excavation can be done without significant risk of collapse.

Process:

1. Site Readiness: The building site is ready, utilities are moved, and the region is fenced off.
2. Uncovering: An enormous opening is dove into the ground utilizing weighty gear like backhoes and tractors. The uncovered soil is taken out from the site.
3. Establishment Development: In the wake of arriving at the ideal profundity, the establishment walls and storm cellar floor are built inside the uncovered region.
4. Refilling: When the cellar walls and floor are set up, the space around the establishment is inlayed with soil or other appropriate materials to give security and backing to the design.

Benefits:

Savvy: Open-cut removal is by and large more practical than different strategies.

Appropriate for Stable Soils: It functions admirably in regions with stable soil conditions and generally safe of breakdown.

Simpler Access: It takes into account more straightforward admittance to the building site and gear.

Drawbacks:

Interruption: The removal cycle can disturb the general climate, influencing close by structures and traffic.

Space Necessities: It requires a bigger building site region for gear and material stockpiling.

Site Imperatives: It probably won't be reasonable for blocked metropolitan regions with restricted space.

Top-Down Method:

Description:

The top-down method is a more innovative approach to basement construction that involves building the basement structure from the top while simultaneously excavating the lower levels. It's used in urban environments with limited space and high land values.

Process:

1. Roof Construction: The roof or ground level of the basement is constructed first.
2. Excavation: As the upper level is constructed, excavation starts beneath it. Temporary supports such as soldier piles or secant piles are installed to prevent collapse.
3. Lower Level Construction: Once excavation reaches a certain depth, the lower basement levels are constructed.
4. Continued Excavation: The process continues, with excavation and construction occurring simultaneously until the desired basement depth is achieved.

Advantages:

Space Productivity: It amplifies space usage, making it ideal for blocked metropolitan regions.

Reduced Disruption: The top-down method minimizes disruption to the surrounding area compared to open cuts.

Faster Construction: Construction of upper levels can begin sooner than in the open cut method, reducing overall project duration.

Disadvantages:

Complex Engineering: Top-down construction requires advanced engineering techniques and careful planning.

Higher Costs: It can be more expensive due to the need for specialized equipment and engineering expertise (Zhang et al. 2021).

Limited Applicability: The top-down method is best suited for areas with specific space constraints, and might not be suitable in areas with stable soil conditions.

Excavation lateral support (ELS) systems

Sheet Piles:

Definition and Usage:

Sheet piles are long, thin sections of steel or other materials driven into the ground to provide temporary or permanent lateral support for excavations. They are often used for retaining walls, cofferdams, and various types of deep foundations.

Construction Process:

Installation: Sheet piles are driven vertically into the ground using specialized equipment, such as hydraulic hammers or vibratory pile drivers. They are interlocked to create a continuous wall.

Interlocking Mechanism: Sheet piles interlock either by having interlocking sections along their edges or by using connectors such as tongue and groove, or ball-and-socket joints.

Excavation: Once the sheet piles are in place, excavation can be carried out safely between the interlocked piles.

Advantages:

Flexibility: Sheet heaps can be utilized in an assortment of soil conditions, including durable and granular soils.

Fast Establishment: They can be introduced generally immediately contrasted with a few different techniques.

Negligible Unsettling influence: Sheet heap establishment causes insignificant ground aggravation, making it appropriate for metropolitan conditions (Mansour et al. 2021).

Cost-Adequacy: now and again, sheet heap walls can be more savvy than different strategies.

Weaknesses:

Restricted Profundity: The profundity of uncovering is much of the time restricted because of the length of sheet heaps and the driving hardware's abilities.

Upkeep: Consumption insurance is significant for steel sheet heaps, and support might be demanded over investment.

Commotion and Vibration: The establishment cycle can produce clamor and vibration, which may be a worry in metropolitan regions.

Diaphragm Walls:

Definition and Utilization:

Stomach walls are primary walls developed in the ground utilizing built up cement to offer horizontal help for profound unearthings. They are many times utilized in metropolitan regions with restricted space.

Development Cycle:

Unearthing: A channel is exhumed utilizing particular gear, frequently a snatch or shaper mounted on a crane.

Reinforcement and Concreting: As the excavation progresses, the trench is filled with a slurry mixture to prevent collapse. Reinforcement cages are inserted, and concrete is poured under the slurry to form the diaphragm wall.

Slurry Removal: The slurry is removed and recycled for future use.

Advantages:

Depth: Diaphragm walls can reach greater depths compared to sheet piles, making them suitable for very deep excavations.

Structural Integrity: The reinforced concrete construction provides high structural integrity and stiffness.

Limited Ground Disturbance: Diaphragm wall construction generates less noise and vibration compared to traditional piling methods.

Disadvantages:

Complex Construction: Diaphragm walls involve a more complex construction process compared to sheet piles.

Limited Versatility: They might be more challenging to implement in certain soil conditions, like hard rock.

Higher Costs: Diaphragm walls tend to be more expensive due to the materials, equipment, and labor required.

Space Requirements: Diaphragm walls require more space for construction equipment, which can be a limitation in densely built areas

Foundation systems

Pad Footing:

1. Description:

Pad footing, also known as isolated footing, is a type of shallow foundation.

It consists of a single, thick concrete slab (pad) that supports a column or a wall load and transfers it to the soil.

Used for individual columns or isolated points of load.

2. Depth:

Pad footings are shallow foundations and are placed closer to the ground surface.

The depth is relatively limited, typically extending only a few feet below the ground level.

3. Load Distribution:

The load from the column or wall is directly transferred to the soil through the pad footing.

The distribution of load is relatively concentrated on the area of the pad (Naik & Patel, 2019).

4. Soil Conditions:

Pad footings are suitable for stable soil conditions with sufficient bearing capacity.

They are generally used in areas with less variability in soil properties.

5. Construction Complexity:

Pad footings are simpler to construct compared to deep foundation systems.

Excavation and concrete pouring processes are relatively straightforward.

6. Cost:

Pad footings tend to be cost-effective for smaller structures and where the soil conditions permit shallow foundations.

Piled Foundation:

1. Description:

Piled foundation is a type of deep foundation system.

It involves driving or drilling long, slender structural elements (piles) deep into the ground to transfer the load to deeper, more stable soil layers or bedrock.

2. Depth:

Piled foundations reach deeper into the ground compared to pad footings.

Depths can vary significantly based on soil conditions and load requirements, ranging from a few meters to tens of meters.

3. Load Distribution:

Piles distribute the load both through the friction between the pile and the surrounding soil and through end-bearing on a more stable layer of soil or bedrock (Jones et al. 2019).

4. Soil Conditions:

Piled foundations are used when the upper layers of soil are not stable enough to support the loads.

They are suitable for areas with varying soil properties and when adequate bearing capacity is available at greater depths.

5. Construction Complexity:

Piled foundation construction is more complex and requires specialized equipment for driving or drilling piles.

Quality control during pile installation is crucial to ensure load-bearing capacity.

6. Cost:

Piled foundations tend to be more expensive due to the additional equipment, labor, and materials required for deep foundation construction.

Comparison:

Depth and Load Distribution: The key difference between pad footings and piled foundations lies in their depth and load distribution (Das & Sobhan, 2019). Pad footings are shallow and transfer loads directly to the immediate soil, while piled foundations penetrate deeper to distribute loads through friction and end-bearing.

Suitable Soil Conditions: Pad footings work best in unstable soil conditions with sufficient bearing capacity, while piled foundations are preferred when the upper soil layers lack stability and suitable bearing capacity is deeper down.

Construction Complexity and Cost: Pad footings are simpler and more cost-effective for smaller structures and stable soil conditions (Bowles, 2020). Piled foundations are more complex to construct, involving specialized equipment and techniques, making them costlier but necessary for larger or heavier structures or challenging soil conditions.

4. Cost comparison of the various basement construction

Cost estimation of open cut vs top down

Open cut

• Site preparation and clearing: $10,000
• Excavation and soil removal: $30,000
• Shoring and support systems: $15,000
• Foundation walls and waterproofing: $20,000
• Backfilling and compaction: $10,000
• Total Estimated Cost: $85,000

Top-down

• Site preparation and clearing: $10,000
• Excavation (incremental): $45,000
• Shoring and support systems: $25,000
• Foundation walls and waterproofing: $25,000
• Basement floor construction: $20,000
• Total Estimated Cost: $125,000

Cost estimation of sheet piles vs diaphragm wall

Total Estimated Cost for Sheet Piles:

Let's assume a cost of $100 per linear foot for steel sheet piles, of $50 per linear foot for installation.

Total Cost = (Total Length of Sheet Piles in linear feet) * (Cost per linear foot) + Engineering Costs + Miscellaneous Costs

Total Cost = (100 ft) * ($150/ft) + $10,000 + $5,000

Total Cost = $15,000 + $10,000 + $5,000

Total Cost = $30,000

Total Estimated Cost for Diaphragm Wall:

Total Cost = (Total Volume of Diaphragm Wall in cubic yards) * (Cost per cubic yard) + Equipment Costs + Engineering Costs + Miscellaneous Costs

Total Cost = (300 cu yd) * ($700/cu yd) + $100,000 + $10,000 + $7,000

Total Cost = $210,000 + $100,000 + $10,000 + $7,000

Total Cost = $327,000

Cost estimation of Foundation systems (pad footing vs piled foundation)

1. Pad Footing Cost Estimation:

Total area of pad footings = 4 footings * (1 meter * 1 meter) = 4 square meters

Total cost for pad footings = Total area * Cost per square meter = 4 sqm * $100/sqm = $400

2. Piled Foundation Cost Estimation:

Total perimeter of building = 2 * (10m + 10m) = 40 meters

Total cost for piles = Total perimeter * Cost per linear meter = 40 meters * $250/meter = $10,000

5. Construction sequencing illustration

Diagram 1: Construction sequence diagram

(Source: Self-created)

Figure 2: Basement layout plan

(Source: Self-created)

6. Conclusion

In conclusion, the careful plan and design of an appropriate basement foundation for a commercial retail development is fundamental. Finding some kind of harmony between underlying strength, obliging retail needs, and is essential to address soil conditions. The establishment's power to help the structure's heaps, compelling waterproofing to forestall harm, and arrangements for openness, ventilation, and lighting add to an effective venture. Cooperation among modelers, specialists, and project workers is fundamental for understanding a cellar establishment that upholds the retail space above as well as gives a protected, practical, and persevering climate for all partners.

Reference list

Journals

• Rahman, M. M., & Gul, M. (2020). Lessons learned from field performance of conventionally constructed shallow foundations on expansive soils. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 34(4), 04020043. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Anastasios-Sextos/publication/341154504_Analytical_expressions_relating_free-field_and_foundation_ground_motions_in_buildings_with_basement_considering_soil-structure_interaction/links/5eb159aa92851cb267742cd6/Analytical-expressions-relating-free-field-and-foundation-ground-motions-in-buildings-with-basement-considering-soil-structure-interaction.pdf. [Retrieved on: 18.08.2023]
• Choobbasti, A. J., Kutanaei, S. S., & Ghanooni-Bagha, M. (2021). Numerical study on vertical bearing capacity of shallow foundations on rock masses using Hoek–Brown failure criterion. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 19(2), 273-285. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Bobur-Matyokubov/publication/369023615_International_Journal_of_Culture_and_Modernity_Thermal_Insulation_of_Basement_Walls_of_Low-Rise_Residential_Buildings_and_Calculation_of_its_Thickness/links/6405bc100cf1030a5678994d/International-Journal-of-Culture-and-Modernity-Thermal-Insulation-of-Basement-Walls-of-Low-Rise-Residential-Buildings-and-Calculation-of-its-Thickness.pdf. [Retrieved on: 18.08.2023]
• Rasoulian, M., & Gibson, A. D. (2020). Numerical study on group effects for shallow foundations above voids in cohesive soil. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 38(6), 6051-6067. Retrieved from: https://inlibrary.uz/index.php/tajet/article/download/9942/10363. [Retrieved on: 18.08.2023]
• Zhang, W., Wang, J. G., & Zhang, Z. (2021). Bearing capacity of shallow foundations in layered transversely isotropic rock masses using the generalized Hoek–Brown criterion. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 80(8), 7359-7373. Retrieved from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S246796741830031X. [Retrieved on: 18.08.2023]
• Mansour, M. F., Taha, M. R., Chik, Z. H., & Elkady, T. Y. (2021). Bearing capacity prediction of shallow foundations on rock masses using Hoek–Brown failure criterion. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 80(8), 6933-6947. Retrieved from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377027323001129. [Retrieved on: 18.08.2023]
• Das, B. M., & Sobhan, K. (2019). Principles of foundation engineering. Cengage learning. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ilugbo-Stephen-Olubusola/publication/362430945_Assessment_of_Probable_Foundation_Problems_Using_Geophysical_and_Remotely_Sensed_Data_in_a_Typical_Basement_Complex_Southwestern_Nigeria/links/62ea32323c0ea8788778cd5f/Assessment-of-Probable-Foundation-Problems-Using-Geophysical-and-Remotely-Sensed-Data-in-a-Typical-Basement-Complex-Southwestern-Nigeria.pdf. [Retrieved on: 18.08.2023]
• Bowles, J. E. (2020). Foundation analysis and design. McGraw-Hill Education. Retrieved from: https://www.academia.edu/download/84129278/GJES.MS.ID.000526.pdf. [Retrieved on: 18.08.2023]
• Jones, A. L., Kramer, S. L., & Arango, I. (2019). Lessons learned: Case history of a basement constructed in expansive soil. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 33(5), 04019045. Retrieved from: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.1201/9781003060826-146/influence-rain-water-percolation-ground-heat-losses-temperature-basement-foundation-carl-eric-hagentoft-johan-claesson. [Retrieved on: 18.08.2023]
• Naik, B. S., & Patel, D. K. (2019). Effect of opening size and location on behavior of isolated footing near slope crest. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 4(1), 1-13. Retrieved from: https://www.astm.org/jte20220660.html. [Retrieved on: 18.08.2023]
• Xiao, Y., Zhang, X., & Goh, A. T. (2019). Bayesian neural network for settlement prediction of shallow foundations built on cohesionless soils. Computers and Geotechnics, 113, 103124. Retrieved from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2090447920301623. [Retrieved on: 18.08.2023]
• Dasaka, S. M., & Zhang, F. (2021). Damage effects on the axial capacity of drilled shafts socketed in weak rock. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 147(7), 04021042. Retrieved from: https://www.academia.edu/download/63439731/9520200527-86227-18t3bo5.pdf. [Retrieved on: 18.08.2023]
• Kumar, J., & Mandal, J. N. (2020). Direct shear interface tests for socketed piles in weak cemented conglomerate rock. International Journal of Geo-Engineering, 11(1), 1-12. Retrieved from: https://academicjournals.org/journal/IJPS/article-full-text/28678DF63872. [Retrieved on: 18.08.2023]
• Ghalesari, A. T., Barari, A., Amini, A. A., & Ghorbani, A. (2020). Physical modeling of the group effects on ultimate bearing capacity of shallow foundations constructed on c–φ soil. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 38(1), 773-789. Retrieved from: https://aees.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/13-Wen-Zhou.pdf. [Retrieved on: 18.08.2023]
• Armal, S., Porter, J. R., Lingle, B., Chu, Z., Marston, M. L., & Wing, O. E. (2020). Assessing property level economic impacts of climate in the US, new insights and evidence from a comprehensive flood risk assessment tool. Climate, 8(10), 116. Retrieved From: https://www.mdpi.com/2225-1154/8/10/116 [Retrieved on: 18.08.2023]
• Vukotic, P., Zekic, R., Andjelic, T., Svrkota, N., Djurovic, A., & Dlabac, A. (2020). Radon on the ground floor in the buildings of pre-university education in Montenegro. Nukleonika, 65. Retrieved From: https://yadda.icm.edu.pl/baztech/element/bwmeta1.element.baztech-eb9acc33-d60a-48d4-b3ec-88aef68f7d36 [Retrieved on: 18.08.2023]
• Al-Rikabi, A. N., Daud, N. N., & Al-Qaisee, G. S. (2021, September). Numerical Analysis of the Basement Wall Behaviour nearby Unsupported Deep Excavation. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 856, No. 1, p. 012054). IOP Publishing. Retrieved From: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/856/1/012054/meta [Retrieved on: 18.08.2023]
• Luque, R., & Bray, J. D. (2020). Dynamic soil-structure interaction analyses of two important structures affected by liquefaction during the Canterbury earthquake sequence. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 133, 106026. Retrieved From: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267726117308448 [Retrieved on: 18.08.2023]
• Alfarizi, L., & Aseanto, R. (2021, August). Comparative Analysis of Semi Basement Wall With Different Cohesion and Basement Depth in West Jakarta. In Journal of World Conference (JWC) (Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 252-265). Retrieved From: http://proceedings.worldconference.id/index.php/prd/article/view/345 [Retrieved on: 18.08.2023]