Mental Health Assignment Sample

Examine the Key Features of the Assessment Tools

Access Free Samples Prepared by our Subject Matter Experts, known for offering the Best Online Assignment Help Services in Australia.

A). Review of diagnostic manuals:

There is a reviewed analysis of the Diagnostic and statistical manual for mental disorders along with the international classification of diseases and biopsychosocial assessment template (Brown & Sellbom, 2022). In this regard, it has been analysed that the DSM-5 is widely utilised in the United States with a focus on the symptoms based diagnosis. On the other hand, the ICD-11 can be recognized globally on the basis of broader medical coding (Brown & Sellbom, 2022). The bicycle social template also considered the psychological social and biological factors.

B). Choice of comparison:

There is a comparison between the DSM-5 with the biopsychosocial assessment template in terms of its prevalence and clinical relevance in the field of mental health assessment (Wilkop et al. 2023).

c). Identification of key aspects:

The DSM-5 has a categorical and pathophysiological approach to mental health with a focus on diagnosis and symptom clusters (Eaton et al. 2023). On the contrary, the biopsychosocial template also considered the interplay of biological psychological and social factors that can further offer a holistic perspective (Bayne & Shune, 2022). Apart from this, the considerations can be included with the cultural sensitivity clinical utility and individualized treatment planning as well.

Apart from this, the DSM 5 categorical approach has been analysed to rely on a checklist of symptoms for diagnosis that has the potential to overlook the underlying psycho-social factors (Salloum et al. 2023). On the contrary, the biopsychosocial template has emphasized a comprehensive assessment with the recognition of the mental health issues along with a complex interplay of biological psychological and social factors (Anderson et al. 2022). The holistic perspective has also allowed a personalized and culturally sensitive approach in the assessment that has facilitated the individualized treatment planning and better patient care outcomes in an efficient way.

A standardised set of criteria is provided by diagnostic manuals, such as the DSM-5 (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) or ICD-10 (International Classification of Diseases), for diagnosing and categorising physical and mental health disorders. These standards are consistently revised to take into account new medical and psychological understanding. Standardisation of assessment instruments and diagnostic manuals ensures that the same standards and practises are applied consistently across various contexts and by various specialists. This preserves the validity and reliability of assessments.

Visualise Your Information

• Inspirations in terms of visual representation are included with visual modes from scholarly sources along with infographics from reputable organisation that have the potential to effectively convey the complex information (Terrado et al. 2022). These models are able to serve as guidance for clear and engaging visuals.
• There is a need to use relevant images icons text charts and diagrams that can ensure that the information is presented in a visually appealing and comprehensive manner so that people can be attracted to the infographics poster maintaining consistency and clarity.

Reflection

I have chosen to compare the DSM-5 with the biopsychosocial assessment template as a result of the understanding that DSM-5 widespread uses in the field of Mental Health can be efficient. The comparison has provided a clear understanding of two distinct approaches in terms of accessing the mental health that can aid health practitioners in terms of making informed decisions regarding the assessment tools that are based on the relevance along with holistic perspective and clinical utility.

References

• Anderson, V., Hearps, S. J. C., Catroppa, C., Beauchamp, M. H., & Ryan, N. P. (2022). What predicts persisting social impairment following pediatric traumatic brain injury: contribution of a biopsychosocial approach. Psychological Medicine, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291722000186
• Bayne, D. F., & Shune, S. E. (2022). A Biopsychosocial Model of Mealtime Management in Persons with Dementia, an Asset-Based Approach to Patient-Centered Care. Geriatrics, 7(5), 112. https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics7050112
• Brown, T. A., & Sellbom, M. (2022). Examining the reliability and validity of the ICD-11 personality disorder severity diagnosis. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 000486742211364. https://doi.org/10.1177/00048674221136457
• Eaton, N. R., Bringmann, L. F., Elmer, T., Fried, E. I., Forbes, M. K., Greene, A. L., Krueger, R. F., Kotov, R., McGorry, P. D., Mei, C., & Waszczuk, M. A. (2023). A review of approaches and models in psychopathology conceptualization research. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-023-00218-4
• Reeve, J. (2022). Hand-Drawn Infographics: A Tool for Reflection and Creativity in Healthcare Research and Beyond. Springer EBooks, 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94423-0_8
• Salloum, I. M., Appleyard, W. J., & Abou-Saleh, M. T. (2023). Individualized Care in Person Centered Medicine. Person Centered Medicine, 105–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17650-0_6
• Terrado, M., Calvo, L., & Christel, I. (2022). Towards more effective visualisations in climate services: good practices and recommendations. Climatic Change, 172(1-2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-022-03365-4
• Wilkop, M., Wade, T. D., Keegan, E., & Cohen-Woods, S. (2023). Impairments among DSM-5 eating disorders: A systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 101, 102267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2023.102267