No AI Generated Content
Introduction: HCCSSD104 Lifespan Development
Access Free Samples Prepared by our Expert Subject Matter Experts, known for offering the Best Online Assignment Help Services in Australia.
Lifespan development refers to the required process that is started from "conception to death to the required human development". The main aim of this report is to adequately analyze major "key theories in developmental psychology" and use two different reflective models to adequately compare. It has mainly used two different reflective models as "GIBBS reflective model and Kolb Reflective Model'' conducted a comparison on select journals in an adequate manner.
Reflective model
GIBBS reflective model
Description
I have analyzed that "Research in Developmental Psychology '' is the effective scientific method for analyzing the effective lifespan of humans. As per the view of van Rooij & Baggio (2021), scientific investigation can have a major effective impact on collecting information related to developmental psychology. I have developed an understanding related to psychology's scientific and unscientific range where the unscientific aspect has been found as falsifiable.
Feelings
The analysis of Developmental Psychology has helped me better understand the role of the scientific aspect. Based on the research information by Lazzara (2021), the analysis of the own biases and assumptions related to psychology development has implicated a better understanding of lifespan development as well. I have developed major psychological information which implied to state required development of psychology and creates an impact on the effective understanding.
Evaluation
The overall experiences from the use of this article have implicated in developing an understanding related to lifespan development. This experience is positive for me as it has helped in effectively understanding the major similarities between lifespan development and Developmental Psychology in an adequate manner. The accumulation of positive experiences has adequately helped in conducting information in a defined way.
Figure 1: GIBBS reflective model
(Source: Adeani et al. 2020)
Analysis
I have developed an understanding related to developmental Psychology and lifespan development of the human which is quite effective for me. The acknowledgement and required accuracy in the range of scientific involvement has made sense in the developmental Psychology of the human. The high range of accuracy has helped me in understanding its effectiveness and make sense of the situation or other related aspects of the selected article in a defined manner.
Conclusion
I have concluded that overall understanding and other related ranges from "developmental Psychology and Lifespan Development '' has implied major differences. The analysis of the information has created a major positive impact and conducted reflection on understanding the relative ability of the aspect between "developmental Psychology and Lifespan Development '' in an appropriate range.
Action plan
I have evaluated all the major aspects that are related at the time of conducting this research. It has implicated that I can make a proper action plan which has included a core understanding of the unscientific range in "developmental Psychology and Lifespan Development". The accumulation of the different ranges in "developmental Psychology and Lifespan Development" apart from the scientific aspect can be analyzed by me if I have the chance to conduct similar research in the future.
Kolb Reflective Model
Concrete experience
The valuation of required "theories in psychology" has been adequately analyzed with the use of selected articles on developmental Psychology. I have mainly developed the skill related to the understanding of the robust phenomena ranges that have arisen as an issue in understanding the required "theories in psychology". As opined by Eronen & Bringmann (2021), three major philosophies based on the selected article have imposed a "relative lack of robust phenomena, problems of validity of psychological constructs, and obstacles to discovering causal relationships between psychological variables".
Reflective observation
I have adequately observed the required aspects that have been included in developmental psychology. The valuation of major ranges in terms of analyzed issues has imposed an understanding of their respective implication in a defined manner. It has helped in developing information related to include aspects of the robust phenomena.
Figure 2: Kolb's reflective model
(Source: Morris, 2020)
Abstract conceptualization
The overall analysis and understanding of relative ranges have helped in understanding that there are several aspects which can be improved effectively. I have recognized that several areas related to psychology can develop apart from "social, developmental, and evolutionary psychology". As per the reference of Snyder et al. (2020), the minimal plausibility can implicate the empirical data that has helped in evaluating overall research in an appropriate manner.
Active experimentation
The improvement was implied at the time of conducting valuation related to developmental psychology. The required analysis is based on the integrated information from "Theory Crisis in Psychology and Theories in Psychological Science" which has helped in developing different aspects of understanding. I have personally analyzed information based on the theories related to lifespan development which is adequately integrated from developmental psychology.
Comparison
The use of "The GIBBS reflective model and the Kolb Reflective Model" can help in analyzing the major differences between these two methods. It has been analyzed from the GIBB model that the valuation of developmental psychology has a positive Evaluation. On the contrary, Kolb's has implicated over-understanding "theories in psychology" which is totally different. The effective action plan from the GIBB model has helped in reflecting understanding of the future steps. On the other hand, Kolb has developed information based on reacted psychology aspects as "social, developmental, and evolutionary psychology". The valuation of these ranges has implicated major different information analyzed from the two different reflective models and created implications on more explored understanding. Gibbs's model has made major focus on the scientific and unscientific information related to lifespan development. On the other hand, involvement of robust technology in understanding developmental psychology has adequately focused on Kolb's reflective model. The comparison of both reflective models has adequately focused on the different ranges that make implications on different aspects of learning in a defined manner.
Conclusion
It has concluded that the valuation required "key theories in developmental psychology and lifespan development" has been adequately analyzed with appropriate use for the two reflective models in a defined manner. It has effectively selected relevant journals that can help in adequate comparison and contracting in an effective and adequate manner. The comparison can basically be made over the analyzed information from both reflective models and create implications on the analyzed m major differences.
Reference
- Adeani, I. S., Febriani, R. B., & Syafryadin, S. (2020). USING GIBBS'REFLECTIVE CYCLE IN MAKING REFLECTIONS OF LITERARY ANALYSIS. Indonesian EFL Journal, 6(2), 139-148. Retrieved on 14th June, 2023 from: https://journal.uniku.ac.id/index.php/IEFLJ/article/view/3382
- Eronen, M. I., & Bringmann, L. F. (2021). The theory crisis in psychology: How to move forward. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(4), 779-788. . Retrieved on 14th June, 2023 from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1745691620970586
- Lazzara, J. (2020). Research in Developmental Psychology. Lifespan Development. Retrieved on 14th June, 2023 from: https://open.maricopa.edu/devpsych/chapter/research-in-developmental-psychology/
- Morris, T. H. (2020). Experiential learning–a systematic review and revision of Kolb's model. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(8), 1064-1077. Retrieved on 14th June, 2023 from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10494820.2019.1570279
- Snyder, C. R., Lopez, S. J., Edwards, L. M., & Marques, S. C. (Eds.). (2020). The Oxford handbook of positive psychology. Oxford university press. Retrieved on 14th June, 2023 from: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=OcoQEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=developmental+psychology&ots=A7zUSsIL3k&sig=6fy4J65YhAQNVVAI8vNVzUJV7CI
- van Rooij, I., & Baggio, G. (2021). Theory before the test: How to build high-verisimilitude explanatory theories in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(4), 682-697. Retrieved on 14th June, 2023 from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1745691620970604
