Climate Change and Soil Carbon Farming Assignment Sample

Introduction: Climate Change and Soil Carbon Farming

Get Free Samples Written by our Top-Notch Subject Expert Writers known for providing the Best Assignment Help Services in Australia

Social Organic Carbon (SOC) levels have decreased since industrialization as a consequence of the agriculturalization of ecological systems. This fact is responsible for transferring 60 to 90 GT of carbon through the soil into the environment. This is a consequence of more soil degradation, soil properties breakdown from field ploughing, and decreased plant matter and residue returning to the soil. The chosen methodology for the assignment is Farm Forestry and biodiversity tree planting. Adopting this methodology can be applied for maintaining the amount of carbon in soil and help to maintain the purity of the ecosystem by planting trees.

Main body

Explanation of methodology

The methodology of Farm Forestry is directly associated with the plantation of trees for carbon farming. Commercial tree cultivation is incorporated into farming systems through farm forestry. It comes in a variety of shapes, such as wood bands, plantings, forest resources, and protruding trees. Seedlings and the environmentally responsible maintenance of native plants standing already in place. A landowner's choice to engage in forestry is what leads to farm forestry. The objectives, assets, and possibilities that landholders participating face, as well as their capacity to plan and oversee their woodlands successfully, will determine how it appears and function (Tang et al. 2019). Farm forestry may play a significant part in alleviating all of the above challenges with good planning and operation. Farm forestry falls under the category of native vegetation and plant communities’ control. Farm forestry, like the majority of eventually followed management techniques, employs trees to solve the environmental issues the world is now experiencing.

On the other hand, the methodology of Farm Forestry and biodiversity is carbon is capable of balancing all the natural resources present in the environment. Farm forestry is a cost-effective choice for areas contemplating interacting directly with management to address environmental issues as a component of its regional Natural Resource Management (NRM) strategy since a single planted may bring many NRM advantages (Jassim et al. 2022). Farm forestry permits the particular landowner to create a second income source simultaneously putting policies in place to deal with local ecological concerns. Farm forestry may supplement revenue from sustainable farming, even though revenue sources are often linked to the manufacture of timber-related goods. Farm forestry funds may be exchanged for ecological remediation and maintaining effectiveness in the soil naturally. For the acquisition of green energy, a business, a landowner downstream, a local authority, a charitable entrepreneur, and funds for purifying water and biodiversity are possible related people.

Analysis of methodology effectiveness

Farm Forestry contains huge operational effectiveness in carbon storage and potential carbon loss. By planting trees and conserving and repairing forest biodiversity, several projects have now been put forth to reduce the loss of forests and the impacts of global warming. In the world, wood and goods made from harvested wood absorb more than 16% of the nation's annual greenhouse gas emissions, and there is room to improve this capability by around 22% for social carbon farming (Mishra et al. 2022). Global evaluations of the characteristics of trees and forests and their benefits to reducing carbon dioxide (CO₂) production have each encouraged and been motivated by these activities. Here, researchers explain the impact of roughly 4.3 trillion plants on native vegetation in the entire world to reduce emissions of CO₂ and the possibility of improving carbon capture capacity in profitable forest areas using data from more than 140,000 national forest census farms.

Farm foresting is also capable of storing carbon in soil and maintaining its quality. It will be similarly effective for agriculture and other processes by the determined methods. Planting more trees may hasten soil Carbon buildup and live tree absorption of Carbon stocks in woods. Deployment has been hampered and could be hampered further by infrastructure issues, social and financial rivalry with some other land uses and functional managers, catastrophic events, and climate change. Although rules force regeneration, just 2% of understaffed federal forests are planted each year (Galetti et al. 2022). In the world, annual live-tree Carbon absorption amounts to 3 to 5% of current forest restoration activities. There are urgent chances to create facilities and depended heavily on planting trees projects to restore and enhance forest biodiversity, and if every understaffed forest in the United States were fully equipped, potential Carbon adsorption capabilities would rise by about more than 25% each year.

Synthesis of multiple sources

Table 1: The volume of Social Organic Carbon (SOC) levels by Farm Forestry

(Source: https://www.fao.org/3/ca9825en/ca9825en.pdf)

The above table critically shows the efficiency of the methodology of Farm Forestry in carbon farming across continents. The given data critically shows that the importance of the methodology is huge for maintaining the amount of carbon soil and the ecosystem. The appropriate quantity of carbon is applicable for increasing the efficiency of the soil by a huge margin (Ward et al. 2019). The use of this methodology is continuously increasing through the years. The method also might be capable for provide more contribution and integrity in the entire carbon farming.

Figure 1: The volume of Social Organic Carbon (SOC) levels by Farm Forestry

(Source: Self-Created in MS Excel)

The graphical representation is based on the above-described table for evaluating the significance of carbon farming. The graphical representation critically describes the amount of carbon farming by different continents through the years. After analyzing the tangible and the graphical representation it can be said that North America comes to the first position in carbon farming. This fact applies to maintaining the balance between carbon efficiency and the ecosystem (White et al. 2021). Similarly, it will also be applicable for encouraging different types of methodology for maintaining the amount of carbon in the soil as well as for the method of carbon farming.

Conclusion

Agriculture, forestry, biodiversity, and the use of carbon can balance every natural resource in the ecosystem. Commercial tree production is incorporated into farming activities through farm forestry. Although sources of revenue are typically linked to the manufacture of wood-based products, farm forestry may increase income through sustainable farming. Deployment has been hampered in the past and may do so again due to structural problems, financial and social rivalry with certain other land uses and functional management, catastrophic events, and climate change. The graphical representation critically examines the extent of carbon farming that has taken place throughout time on different continents.

References

Journals

• Galetti, M., Carmignotto, A.P., Percequillo, A.R., Santos, M.C.D.O., Ferraz, K.M.P., Lima, F., Vancine, M.H., Muylaert, R.L., Bonfim, F.C.G., Magioli, M. and Abra, F.D., 2022. Mammals in São Paulo State: diversity, distribution, ecology, and conservation. Biota Neotropica, 22.
• Jassim, D., Witt, B. and Evans, M.C., 2022. Community perceptions of carbon farming: A case study of the semi-arid Mulga Lands in Queensland, Australia. Journal of Rural Studies, 96, pp.78-88.
• Mishra, A., Humpenöder, F., Churkina, G., Reyer, C.P., Beier, F., Bodirsky, B.L., Schellnhuber, H.J., Lotze-Campen, H. and Popp, A., 2022. Land use change and carbon emissions of a transformation to timber cities. Nature communications, 13(1), pp.1-12.
• Tang, K., He, C., Ma, C. and Wang, D., 2019. Does carbon farming provide a cost?effective option to mitigate GHG emissions? Evidence from China. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 63(3), pp.575-592.
• Ward, K.J., Chabrillat, S., Neumann, C. and Foerster, S., 2019. A remote sensing adapted approach for soil organic carbon prediction based on the spectrally clustered LUCAS soil database. Geoderma, 353, pp.297-307.
• White, R.E., Davidson, B. and Eckard, R., 2021. An everyman’s guide for a landholder to participate in soil carbon farming in Australia. Occasional Paper, 21.