Introduction

Access Free Samples Prepared by our Subject Matter Experts, known for offering the Best Online Assignment Help Services in Australia.

In this essay, the researcher focuses on the “Analyzing of Franklin house building for development.” The architectural dynamic reacts to the possibilities and problems that the environment presents constantly. The deliberate decision-making process used by designers and architects, known as architectural agency, is essential in determining how the built environment is shaped and how it interacts with the surrounding environment, urban areas, and society. The term "agency" here refers to the capacity of people or other entities to intentionally choose their behaviors and make decisions that affect their environment. "Architectural agency" recognizes that people who design physical places have the purpose, vision, and decision-making authority to create surroundings that have a significant influence on the larger community. In addition, the concept of "community well-being" refers to the overall health, contentment, and overall quality of life of a population residing in a particular region. It considers several factors, such as the mental, social, and physical health of the population as well as their access to opportunities and resources that raise their standard of living in the community. The major focus of the investigation is this dynamic interaction between architectural agencies and community well-being.

Discussion

An architectural agency impacts social engagement and the well-being of a community

This particular section evaluates here to analyzing the development of the Franklin house building that is situated in Australia. The agency is handling the architectural agency and the community is well established to support social engagement and other things. This model was the welfare of society, architectural agency is a complex idea that is analyzed to determine social interaction and general well-being for Franklin's house. It is difficult to identify the analysis of the system at the center of this decision to comprehend its implications in the system. The "community well-being" shows that the health issues, and standard of living of a population switch in certain areas (Xu et al. 2020). The mental status of social and physical health are the main features of life that have to be analyzed and implemented with the help of these opportunities and resources in the community.

Figure 1: Architectural Structure of Franklin's House

(Source: www.dynamic-media-cdn.tripadvisor.com)

The social involvement within a community is greatly impacted by architectural agency, which has been shown in Nightingale's project. Social connection may be facilitated or hindered by the deliberate decisions made by designers and architects when developing public places, buildings, and urban landscapes. For the Franklin building, architects may stimulate social interaction and gathering by including architectural features such as parks, public squares, and pedestrian-friendly paths. These deliberate design elements strengthen social cohesiveness, cultivate a feeling of community, and provide areas for chance meetings, all of which improve the community's social fabric. On the other hand, designs that emphasize seclusion, such as gated communities or urban planning that is centered on cars, may stifle social interaction and result in a disjointed and disjointed neighborhood. Essentially, architectural agencies may foster social involvement by creating environments that support communication, teamwork, and a feeling of community among residents (Newrzella et al. 2021). The overall health of a community is significantly impacted by architectural agencies as well for the Franklin house. The health issues are related to the physical and the mental so it has to be avoided from life and implement the ecosystem. Important spaces are important, motivating, and supportive of focus and relaxation, architectural decisions about ventilation, natural light, and noiselessness may improve the mental health of occupants. Careful architectural and urban planning may increase accessibility to jobs, healthcare, and education, all of which are critical for the general well-being of a society.

Figure 2: Outer Area of Franklin's House

(Source: www.dynamic-media-cdn.tripadvisor.com)

The architectural agency also affects a community's resilience and sustainability, two factors that are critical to its overall well-being. Sustainable design techniques may lessen a community's influence on the environment, save utility costs, and improve the long-term health of its citizens. The social interaction and community well-being are significantly impacted by architectural agency, or the intentional decisions made by designers and architects while constructing physical environments. Architects can cultivate a feeling of belonging and community by designing areas that promote social interaction and harmony (D'Alimonte et al. 2020). By designing spaces that encourage physical exercise, lower stress levels, and provide access to necessary services, architectural agencies also have an impact on people's mental and physical health. Furthermore, it is essential to sustainability and resilience because architects can design resource and environmentally-conscious buildings that improve a community's long-term well-being.

The Franklin House Building representatives of a particular social, environmental, or urban condition

This essay focuses on the Franklin House Building/Project that serves as both a mirror and a template or design for social, environmental, and urban events, capturing the fundamental qualities of the architectural agency. Through the critical lens of architectural agency, by analyzing the thoughtful choices that create the project. Architectural agency is the ability of buildings to affect and react to their environment. This study explores how the structure or project becomes an image of the complicated environment it exists in by examining various aspects of design, spatial arrangements, and materiality. By doing this, this particular essay sets out an attempt to discover the story that is connected in its structure and uncover the beneficial partnership between architecture and surroundings, that will help Franklin's construction of Franklin's house.

Figure 3: Condition of social, urban, and environmental.

(Source: Self-created in MS Word)

Social conditions, Environmental conditions and urban condition

Architectural agency overcomes the conventional idea of static structures, as shown in popular projects such as Nightingale. By this aspect, the researcher implemented this in the development of the Franklin House. It is a continually driving change, as shown via thoughtful creative decisions that are in line with Nightingale's dedication to sustainable living in cities (Bertoldi et al. 2021). The integration of green areas, community-focused planning, and passive design principles into Nightingale buildings shows how the architectural agency can act as a catalyst for good change for this reason this concept is also evaluated in the building of the Franklin House. The building under consideration makes thoughtful choices in its planning and building to show a conscious response to the changing demands of its surroundings, much as Nightingale reinvents housing models. Structures given by architectural agencies become active players in the always-changing conversation between architecture and the larger situations it aims to reflect, whether via creative design principles, sustainable elements, or a dedication to community participation. The Project is a powerful demonstration of architectural agency; it is a dynamic force that organizes important conversations with its surroundings for the Franklin House which is situated in Australia (Chen et al. 2021). From the strength of its structural form to the decision of its geometric arrangements, every aspect of its design demonstrates a purposeful desire to interact with and influence the immediate social, environmental, and urban environment.

Figure 4: Environmental conditions of Franklin's House

(Source: www.dynamic-media-cdn.tripadvisor.com)

The Project is more than just a physical structure; it serves as a medium for revolutionary concepts and methods, smartly incorporating sustainability, convenience, and creativity into its design or model. The evidence of architectural agency may be found in certain design aspects or characteristics that go beyond the typical construction limits. These selections are intentional representations of the building of Franklin House interacting with the environment rather than being random choices. The project becomes an apparent representation of the architect's dedication to bringing about positive change. By analyzing the architectural agency presented, the Nightingale article aims to improve the reader's awareness of how architecture affects and develops experiences for individuals while highlighting its important contribution to favorable change and advancement of society. With better environmental conditions building the Franklin house will be easier. A guiding part that goes beyond the traditional idea of architectural spaces is community wellness. In this context, "community well-being" refers to the overall well-being of the people and communities existing close to the building. The project is a country center that promotes diversity, social ties, and a feeling of belonging instead of just being a structure made of bricks for the Franklin house (Hills & Schleicher, 2021). By integrating thoughtful design elements like certain features or geographical considerations, The project is actively contributing to improving the living conditions for its residents. This dedication to the general well-being of the community affects both the inside and outside of the building. Reflecting on the transformational power of architectural agency, the project serves as an appealing case study that challenges everyone to negotiate the intricate details of architecture worldwide.

The architecture responded to a particular social, environmental, or urban challenge

Architecture continues to show its capacity to react to particular environmental, social, or urban issues through the application of architectural agency. It is essential to clarify the fundamental concepts that underlie this investigation to fully understand the complex link between design, modal, and these difficulties. "Agency" refers to the capacity of people or things to make deliberate decisions and perform acts that affect their environment. The framework of an architecture agency emphasizes the goal, the vision, and the authority to make decisions that are granted to designers, architects, and other players in the design and construction process. "Architectural agency" recognizes the important role people who shape the built environment play by embracing the deliberate choices made throughout the development and construction stages. Franklin House exemplifies how design has adapted to social and urban concerns, especially in the context of preserving history and adaptive reuse (Pang et al. 2020). Franklin House, a historic structure of significant cultural or historic significance, was facing decay and abandonment. This structure, which was located in a failing urban area, could act as a catalyst for good development in the community. The necessity of maintaining Franklin House as an important component of the city's legacy and tackling the social and urban difficulties connected with its neglect was acknowledged by architectural agencies. The architects' and preservationists' intentional efforts to repair and repurpose Franklin House demonstrated their dedication to renewing the urban fabric and boosting communal well-being.

Figure 5: Historic Structure of Franklin's House

(Source: www.dynamic-media-cdn.tripadvisor.com)

Franklin House's renovation required significant architectural interventions to guarantee that the structure's stability and historical identity were preserved. This work not only gave the ancient edifice new life but also generated prospects for community participation and economic growth. Franklin House has been converted into a cultural center complete with a museum, galleries for art, and event rooms, serving as a focus for creative community events. Engineers and urban planners aggressively tackled urban degradation and socioeconomic concerns by reusing Franklin House in this fashion. The renovated structure became a focal point for the neighborhood's cultural and economic activities, drawing both locals and visitors. The project enhanced pedestrian-friendly access and built a sense of togetherness in the community by converting the historic building into a thriving cultural and social center. The Franklin House instance shows how architectural firms may effectively adapt to social as well as urban concerns. The thoughtful decisions taken to conserve and repurpose this ancient structure not only protected its cultural significance but also were taken to revitalize a failing urban neighborhood. It exemplifies the capacity of design to deal with social and urban challenges while also improving communal well-being. First, eco-friendly and sustainable design in architecture has been a response to urgent environmental issues (Franklin et al. 2021). In the Nightingale project, green construction techniques and sustainable design concepts have been made possible by architectural agencies, who have recognized the pressing need to address environmental deterioration and climate change. Green roofs, rainwater collection, renewable energy sources, and energy-efficient technologies are commonplace in buildings and urban projects. By making these decisions, we may actively lower the carbon impact of buildings, protect essential resources, and lessen the negative effects of urban growth on natural ecosystems. By focusing on creating constructed spaces that are environmentally sustainable and ecologically responsible, these architectural solutions directly address the environmental problem of climate change. Consequently, architectural agencies actively support clean air, lower energy costs, and a more environmentally friendly way of life, improving community well-being and contributing to the worldwide commitment to environmental preservation. Second, architecture has addressed social issues by bringing metropolitan areas back to life, especially in underserved or disadvantaged fields. In response to urgent societal concerns, architects are deliberately using their agency to rebuild and reuse pre-existing buildings, such as abandoned manufacturing facilities or storage facilities, and to design accessible public spaces. Underprivileged communities are given new life by these redevelopment initiatives, which provide venues for artistic expression, community involvement, and employment prospects. The social response of architecture is best shown by architectural interventions like the affordable center of the art, and art centers (Puyt et al. 2020). The architectural agency constantly contributes to the welfare of communities by addressing concerns of social fairness, encouraging local economies, and developing a feeling of belonging and pride among inhabitants by converting previously ignored or declining regions into lively, socially inclusive settings to analyze the building structure and modify the problems related to design or model.

Lastly, mixed-use complexes and pedestrian-friendly designs have been promoted by architects as solutions to urban problems. To address the problems of urban traffic, pollution, and underdeveloped public areas, architectural firms have pushed for models that have to solve the problem by putting walkability, connectedness, and a decrease in the use of cars first. To build self-contained, livable districts where inhabitants can work, purchase goods, and relax without having to go far, mixed-use developments which are defined by a mixing of homes, businesses, and recreational spaces are being deliberately implemented. Wide walkways, bike lanes, and plenty of green space are other elements that have been included in architectural and urban planning plans to create surroundings that promote physical exercise, social contact, and a better way of life. These architectural solutions improve urban mobility, lower pollution levels, and improve the general level of life in cities, all while actively addressing urban issues and promoting community well-being.

Figure 6: Wide Walkways, Bike Lanes, And Plenty Of Green Space In Franklin's House

(Source: www.dynamic-media-cdn.tripadvisor.com)

Furthermore, how urban spaces are being repurposed and revitalized in underprivileged areas is an example of how design can solve social concerns by creating places that are inclusive, financially viable, and culturally rich. In reaction to traffic jams and pollution, mixed-use projects and pedestrian-friendly designs for cities are being promoted. This shows how architectural agencies may improve community well-being by fostering walkable, linked, and healthier communities (Winans et al. 2021). The ability of architectural agencies to confront and adapt to these complex difficulties is important to their role in enhancing community well-being around the globe, even as it continues to challenge an easily accessible ecosystem.

Conclusion

The essay on the Franklin House ends here in a perfect way. The construction agencies play an important part in determining the reaction of construction to specific environmental, social, and urban challenges. Provided the purpose and goal, architects and designers have used their ability to make decisions to create creative solutions. They solve urgent environmental issues by lowering the ecological imprint and improving community well-being via eco-friendly and sustainable architecture. Moreover, architectural agencies promote inclusion and economic development by reviving impoverished areas via projects using adaptive reuse and smart design. Additionally, mixed-use projects and pedestrian-friendly urban design address urban issues by enhancing accessibility as well as quality of life. Essentially, the architectural agency is a dynamic force that influences society, the surroundings, and urban life favorably through changing the physical environment.

References

Till, Jeremy, Nishat Awan, and Tatjana Schneider. Spatial Agency: Other Ways of Doing Architecture. New York, NY: Routledge, 2013. Reitrived From: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=7ZXcAAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT28&dq=Till,+Jeremy,+Nishat+Awan,+and+Tatjana+Schneider.+Spatial+Agency:+Other+Ways+of+Doing+Architecture.+New+York,+NY:+Routledge,+2013&ots=vvDHFSIQzP&sig=Q8fjHM0GVAdESbZuMv7idgHFpgM [Retrieved On: 10.10.2023]

Till, Jeremy. Architecture Depends. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2009. Reitrived From: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=0rC6ezoGHcMC&oi=fnd&pg=PR7&dq=Till,+Jeremy.+Architecture+Depends.+Cambridge,+Mass:+MIT+Press,+2009.+&ots=g5SATrqhe6&sig=oBYNx6oLcI2Uf6o0tusEO9zpNCk [Retrieved On: 10.10.2023]

Deamer, Peggy. The Architect as Worker: Immaterial Labor, the Creative Class, and the Politics of Design. Edited by Peggy Deamer, 61-81. London, England: Bloomsbury Academic, 2015. Reitrived From: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=n4LRCQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=Deamer,+Peggy.+The+Architect+as+Worker:+Immaterial+Labor,+the+Creative+Class,+and+the+Politics+of+Design.+Edited+by+Peggy+Deamer,+61-81.+London,+England:+Bloomsbury+Academic,+2015.+&ots=Iwh_HQBORv&sig=74sNGvhwxy0ifFlyXHRXUC01eEg [Retrieved On: 10.10.2023]

Xu, X., Xiao, B., & Li, C. Z. (2020). Critical factors of electricity consumption in residential buildings: An analysis from the point of occupant characteristics view. Journal of Cleaner Production, 256, 120423. Reitrived From: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652620304704 [Retrieved On: 10.10.2023]

Newrzella, S. R., Franklin, D. W., & Haider, S. (2021). 5-dimension cross-industry digital twin applications model and analysis of digital twin classification terms and models. IEEE Access, 9, 131306-131321. Reitrived From: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9546782/ [Retrieved On: 10.10.2023]

D'Alimonte, R., De Sio, L., & Franklin, M. N. (2020). From issues to goals: A novel conceptualisation, measurement and research design for comprehensive analysis of electoral competition. West European Politics, 43(3), 518-542. Reitrived From: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01402382.2019.1655958 [Retrieved On: 10.10.2023]

Bertoldi, P., Boza-Kiss, B., Della Valle, N., & Economidou, M. (2021). The role of one-stop shops in energy renovation-A comparative analysis of OSSs cases in Europe. Energy and Buildings, 250, 111273. Reitrived From: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778821005570 [Retrieved On: 10.10.2023]

Chen, L., Wei, Q., Fu, Q., & Feng, D. (2021). Spatiotemporal evolution analysis of habitat quality under high-speed urbanization: A case study of urban core area of China Lin-Gang Free Trade Zone (2002–2019). Land, 10(2), 167. Reitrived From: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/2/167 [Retrieved On: 10.10.2023]

Hills Jr, R. M., & Schleicher, D. (2020). Building Coalitions Out of Thin Air: Transferable Development Rights and “Constituency Effects” in Land Use Law. Journal of Legal Analysis, 12, 79-135. Reitrived From: [Retrieved On: 10.10.2023]

Reitrived From: https://academic.oup.com/jla/article-abstract/doi/10.1093/jla/laz008/5835487 [Retrieved On: 10.10.2023]

Pang, W., Cui, Y., Zhang, Q., Wilson, G. J., & Yan, H. (2020). A comparative analysis on performances of flat plate photovoltaic/thermal collectors in view of operating media, structural designs, and climate conditions. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 119, 109599. Reitrived From: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136403211930807X [Retrieved On: 10.10.2023]

Franklin, A. B., Dugger, K. M., Lesmeister, D. B., Davis, R. J., Wiens, J. D., White, G. C., ... & Wise, H. (2021). Range-wide declines of northern spotted owl populations in the Pacific Northwest: A meta-analysis. Biological Conservation, 259, 109168. Reitrived From: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320721002202 [Retrieved On: 10.10.2023]

Puyt, R., Lie, F. B., De Graaf, F. J., & Wilderom, C. P. (2020). Origins of SWOT analysis. In Academy of management proceedings (Vol. 2020, No. 1, p. 17416). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management. Reitrived From: https://journals.aom.org/doi/abs/10.5465/AMBPP.2020.132 [Retrieved On: 10.10.2023]

Winans, K., Dlott, F., Harris, E., & Dlott, J. (2021). Sustainable value mapping and analysis methodology: Enabling stakeholder participation to develop localized indicators mapped to broader sustainable development goals. Journal of Cleaner Production, 291, 125797. Reitrived From: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652621000172 [Retrieved On: 10.10.2023]